Evaluation of pointing performance on screen edges

ABSTRACT

Pointing on screen edges is a frequent task in our everyday use of computers. Screen edges can help stop cursor movements, requiring less precise movements from the user. Thus, pointing at elements located on the edges should be faster than pointing in the central screen area. This article presents two experiments to better understand the foundations of "edge pointing". The first study assesses several factors both on completion time and on users' mouse movements. The results highlight some weaknesses in the current design of desktop environments (such as the cursor shape) and reveal that movement direction plays an important role in users' performance. The second study quantifies the gain of edge pointing by comparing it with other models such as regular pointing and crossing. The results not only show that the gain can be up to 44%, but also reveal that movement angle has an effect on performance for all tested models. This leads to a generalization of the 2D Index of Difficulty of Accot and Zhai that takes movement direction into account to predict pointing time using Fitts' law.

REFERENCES

• 1: Johnny Accot , Shumin Zhai, More than dotting the i's --- foundations for crossing-based interfaces, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: Changing our world, changing ourselves, April 20-25, 2002, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA [doi>10.1145/503376.503390]
• 2: Johnny Accot , Shumin Zhai, Refining Fitts' law models for bivariate pointing, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, April 05-10, 2003, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, USA [doi>10.1145/642611.642646]
• 3: M. Akamatsu, I. S. Mackenzie, and T. Hasbroucq. A comparison of tactile, auditory, and visual feedback in a pointing task using a mouse-type device. Ergonomics, 38(4):816--827, 1995.
• 4: Caroline Appert , Michel Beaudouin-Lafon, SwingStates: adding state machines to the swing toolkit, Proceedings of the 19th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, October 15-18, 2006, Montreux, Switzerland [doi>10.1145/1166253.1166302]
• 5: AskTog. A quiz designed to give you Fitts, 1999. http://www.asktog.com/columns/022DesignedToGiveFitts.html.
• 6: Patrick Baudisch , Ruth Rosenholtz, Halo: a technique for visualizing off-screen objects, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, April 05-10, 2003, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, USA [doi>10.1145/642611.642695]
• 7: J. Boritz, K. S. Booth, and W. B. Cowan. Fitts's Law Studies of Directional Mouse Movement. In Proc. GI '91, pages 216--223. Canadian Hum.-Comp. Comm. Soc., 1991.
• 8: S. K. Card , W. K. English , B. J. Burr, Evaluation of mouse, rate-controlled isometric joystick, step keys, and text keys, for text selection on a CRT, Human-computer interaction: a multidisciplinary approach, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, 1987
• 9: P. M. Fitts. The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. J. Exper. Psych., 47:381--391, 1954.
• 10: Tovi Grossman , Ravin Balakrishnan, A probabilistic approach to modeling two-dimensional pointing, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), v.12 n.3, p.435-459, September 2005 [doi>10.1145/1096737.1096741]
• 11: Mark S. Hancock , Kellogg S. Booth, Improving menu placement strategies for pen input, Proceedings of Graphics Interface 2004, p.221-230, May 17-19, 2004, London, Ontario, Canada
• 12: ISO. 9241--9 Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs)-Part 9: Requirements for non-keyboard input devices. Inter. Org. for Standard., 2000.
• 13: Wendy E. Mackay , Caroline Appert , Michel Beaudouin-Lafon , Olivier Chapuis , Yangzhou Du , Jean-Daniel Fekete , Yves Guiard, Touchstone: exploratory design of experiments, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, April 28-May 03, 2007, San Jose, California, USA [doi>10.1145/1240624.1240840]
• 14: I. S. MacKenzie. Fitts' law as a research and design tool in human-computer interaction. Hum.-Comput. Interact., 7:91--139, 1992.
• 15: I. Scott MacKenzie , William Buxton, Extending Fitts' law to two-dimensional tasks, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, p.219-226, May 03-07, 1992, Monterey, California, United States [doi>10.1145/142750.142794]
• 16: I. Scott MacKenzie , Abigail Sellen , William A. S. Buxton, A comparison of input devices in element pointing and dragging tasks, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: Reaching through technology, p.161-166, April 27-May 02, 1991, New Orleans, Louisiana, United States [doi>10.1145/108844.108868]
• 17: Barry A. Po , Brian D. Fisher , Kellogg S. Booth, Comparing cursor orientations for mouse, pointer, and pen interaction, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, April 02-07, 2005, Portland, Oregon, USA [doi>10.1145/1054972.1055013]
• 18: Jef Raskin, The humane interface: new directions for designing interactive systems, ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., New York, NY, 2000
• 19: N. Smyrnis, I. Evdokimidis, T. Constantinidis, and G. Kastrinakis. Speed-accuracy trade-off in the performance of pointing movements in different directions in two-dimensional space. Experimental Brain Research, 134(1):21--31, 2000.
• 20: Thomas G. Whisenand , Henry H. Emurian, Some effects of angle of approach on icon selection, Conference companion on Human factors in computing systems, p.298-299, May 07-11, 1995, Denver, Colorado, United States [doi>10.1145/223355.223683]

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.5 INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION (I.7)
      H.5.2 User Interfaces (D.2.2, H.1.2, I.3.6)

General Terms:
Experimentation, Human Factors, Performance

Keywords:
Fitts' law, edge pointing, performance modelling, screen edges