Test-driven development in education: experiences with critical viewpoints

ABSTRACT

Test-Driven Development (TDD) was applied in educational setting right after it became well-known as a key practice of Extreme Programming (XP). Basically, there are many studies reporting positive experiences on TDD applied in different levels of a curriculum. In this paper, we discuss the role of TDD in education through the students' experiences. In our experiment, a challenging programming task was applied in order to see what kind of difficulties the students would encounter and discuss. The students' answers revealed several topics that require a careful treatment in teaching to avoid conceptual confusion. For example, the topics include the scalability of TDD, extent of single test, and discipline.

REFERENCES

• 1: Kent Beck, Extreme programming explained: embrace change, Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, MA, 1999
• 2: Constructivism in computer science education, Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, v.20 n.1, p.45-73, January 2001
• 3: Y. Dubinsky and O. Hazzan. Improvement of software quality: Introducing extreme programming into a project-based course. In 14th International Conference of the Israel Society for Quality, pages 8--12, Jerusalem, Israel, 2002.
• 4: Stephen H. Edwards, Rethinking computer science education from a test-first perspective, Companion of the 18th annual ACM SIGPLAN conference on Object-oriented programming, systems, languages, and applications, October 26-30, 2003, Anaheim, CA, USA [doi>10.1145/949344.949390]
• 5: B. G. Glaser and A. L. Strauss. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine de Gruyter, New York, 1967.
• 6: Görel Hedin , Lars Bendix , Boris Magnusson, Teaching extreme programming to large groups of students, Journal of Systems and Software, v.74 n.2, p.133-146, 15 January 2005 [doi>10.1016/j.jss.2003.09.026]
• 7: Christopher G. Jones, Test-driven development goes to school, Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, v.20 n.1, p.220-231, October 2004
• 8: Karen Keefe , Judithe Sheard , Martin Dick, Adopting XP practices for teaching object oriented programming, Proceedings of the 8th Austalian conference on Computing education, p.91-100, January 16-19, 2006, Hobart, Australia
• 9: M. L. Maehr. Meaning and motivation: Toward a theory of personal investment. In R. E. Ames and C. Ames, editors, Research on Motivation in Learning, volume 1, pages 115--144. Academic Press, Orlando, Florida, 1984.
• 10: Will Marrero , Amber Settle, Testing first: emphasizing testing in early programming courses, Proceedings of the 10th annual SIGCSE conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education, June 27-29, 2005, Caparica, Portugal
• 11: R. Martin. Bowling game kata http://www.butunclebob.com/files/downloads/Bowling%20Game%20Kata.ppt, 2005.
• 12: Matthias M. Müller , Walter F. Tichy, Case study: extreme programming in a university environment, Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Software Engineering, p.537-544, May 12-19, 2001, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
• 13: Daniel H. Steinberg , Daniel W. Palmer, Extreme Software Engineering A Hands-On Approach, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2003

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  K. Computing Milieux
  K.3 COMPUTERS AND EDUCATION
      K.3.2 Computer and Information Science Education
          Subjects: Computer science education

General Terms:
Experimentation

Keywords:
TDD, education