Evaluating OO example programs for CS1

ABSTRACT

Example programs play an important role in learning to program. They work as templates, guidelines, and inspiration for learners when developing their own programs. It is therefore important to provide learners with high quality examples. In this paper, we discuss properties of example programs that might affect the teaching and learning of object-oriented programming. Furthermore, we present an evaluation instrument for example programs and report on initial experiences of its application to a selection of examples from popular introductory programming textbooks.

REFERENCES

• 1: AAAS. Benchmarks for science literacy, a tool for curriculum reform, 1989. http://www.project2061.org/publications/bsl/default.htm, last visited 2007-12-07.
• 2: L. Böszörményi. Why Java is not my favorite first-course language. Software-Concepts & Tools, 19(3):141--145, 1998.
• 3: Lionel C. Briand , Christian Bunse , John W. Daly, A Controlled Experiment for Evaluating Quality Guidelines on the Maintainability of Object-Oriented Designs, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, v.27 n.6, p.513-530, June 2001 [doi>10.1109/32.926174]
• 4: M. Clancey. Misconceptions and attitudes that infere with learning to program. In S. Fincher and M. Petre, editors, Computer Science Education Research, pages 85--100. Taylor & Francis, Lisse, The Netherlands, 2004.
• 5: R. Clark, F. Nguyen, and J. Sweller. Efficiency in Learning, Evidence-Based Guidelines to Manage Cognitive Load. Wiley & Sons, San Francisco, CA, USA, 2006.
• 6: M. H. Dodani. Hello World! goodbye skills! Journal of Object Technology, 2(1):23--28, 2003.
• 7: Ann E. Fleury, Programming in Java: student-constructed rules, Proceedings of the thirty-first SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, p.197-201, March 07-12, 2000, Austin, Texas, United States
• 8: Mark Guzdial, Centralized mindset: a student problem with object-oriented programming, Proceedings of the twenty-sixth SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, p.182-185, March 02-04, 1995, Nashville, Tennessee, United States
• 9: Simon Holland , Robert Griffiths , Mark Woodman, Avoiding object misconceptions, Proceedings of the twenty-eighth SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, p.131-134, February 27-March 01, 1997, San Jose, California, United States
• 10: Essi Lahtinen , Kirsti Ala-Mutka , Hannu-Matti Järvinen, A study of the difficulties of novice programmers, Proceedings of the 10th annual SIGCSE conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education, June 27-29, 2005, Caparica, Portugal
• 11: Liz, Bills, T. Dreyfus, J. Mason, P. Tsamir, A. Watson, and O. Zaslavsky. Exemplification in mathematics education. In Proceedings of the 30th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Vol. 1, pages 126--154, 2006.
• 12: Katherine Malan , Ken Halland, Examples that can do harm in learning programming, Companion to the 19th annual ACM SIGPLAN conference on Object-oriented programming systems, languages, and applications, October 24-28, 2004, Vancouver, BC, CANADA [doi>10.1145/1028664.1028702]
• 13: J. Mason and D. Pimm. Generic Examples: Seeing the General in the Particular. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 15(3):277--289, 1984.
• 14: Paul W. Oman , Curtis R. Cook, Typographic style is more than cosmetic, Communications of the ACM, v.33 n.5, p.506-520, May 1990 [doi>10.1145/78607.78611]
• 15: Nick Ourusoff, Primitive types in Java considered harmful, Communications of the ACM, v.45 n.8, August 2002 [doi>10.1145/545151.545182]
• 16: Kate Sanders , Lynda Thomas, Checklists for grading object-oriented CS1 programs: concepts and misconceptions, Proceedings of the 12th annual SIGCSE conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education, June 25-27, 2007, Dundee, Scotland
• 17: A. Takang, P. Grubb, and R. Macredie. The effects of comments and identifier names on program comprehensibility: an experimental investigation. Journal of Programming Languages, 4(143):167, 1996.
• 18: K. VanLehn. Cognitive skill acquisition. Annual Review of Psychology, 47:513--539, 1996.
• 19: Ralph Westfall, Technical opinion: Hello, world considered harmful, Communications of the ACM, v.44 n.10, p.129-130, Oct. 2001 [doi>10.1145/383845.383874]
• 20: Cheng-Chih Wu , Janet Mei-Chuen Lin , Kai-Yin Lin, A content analysis of programming examples in high school computer textbooks in Taiwan, Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, v.18 n.3, p.225-244, Sept. 1999
• 21: R. Zazkis, P. Liljedahl, and E. J. Chernoff. The role of examples in forming and refuting generalizations. ZDM Mathematics Education, 40:131--141, 2008.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  K. Computing Milieux
  K.3 COMPUTERS AND EDUCATION
      K.3.2 Computer and Information Science Education
          Subjects: Computer science education

General Terms:
Experimentation, Human Factors, Measurement

Keywords:
cs1, example programs, object-orientation, quality