An interactive game-design assistant

ABSTRACT

Game-design novices increasingly hope to use game-like expression as a way to express content such as opinions and educational material. Existing game-design toolkits such as Game Maker ease the programming burden, bringing the design of small games within the technical reach of low-budget, non-expert groups. The design process itself remains a roadblock, however: It is not at all obvious how to present topics such as political viewpoints or bike safety in a way that makes use of the unique qualities of the interactive game medium. There are no tools to assist in that aspect of the game design process, and as a result virtually all expressive games come from a small number of game studios founded by experts in designing such games. We propose a game-design assistant that acts in a mixed-initiative fashion, helping the author understand the content of her design-in-progress, providing suggestions or automating the process where possible, and even offering the possibility for parts of the game to be dynamically generated at runtime in response to player interaction. We describe a prototype system that interactively helps authors define spaces of games in terms of common-sense constraints on their real-world references, provides support for them to understand and iteratively refine such spaces, and realizes specific games from the spaces as playable mobile-phone games in response to user input.

REFERENCES

• 1: Sherman R. Alpert, Graceful Interaction with Graphical Constraints, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, v.13 n.2, p.82-91, March 1993 [doi>10.1109/38.204971]
• 2: D. Andre and S. Russell. Programming reinforcement learning agents. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS), 2000.
• 3: S. Bhat, C. L. Isbell, Jr., and M. Mateas. On the difficulty of modular reinforcement learning for real-world partial programming. In Proceedings of the 21st National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), 2006.
• 4: Ian Bogost, Persuasive Games: The Expressive Power of Videogames, The MIT Press, 2007
• 5: Alan Borning , Robert Duisberg, Constraint-based tools for building user interfaces, ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), v.5 n.4, p.345-374, Oct. 1986 [doi>10.1145/27623.29354]
• 6: B. Chandrasekaran, Design problem solving: a task analysis, AI Magazine, v.11 n.4, p.59-71, Winter 1990
• 7: C. Fellbaum, editor. WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database. MIT Press, 1998.
• 8: G. Frasca. Play the Message: Play, Game and Videogame Rhetoric. PhD thesis, IT University of Copenhagen, 2007.
• 9: Y. Gil and J. Kim. Interactive knowledge acquisition tools: A tutoring perspective. In Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 2002.
• 10: C. Gingold. What WarioWare can teach us about game design. Game Studies, 5(1), 2005.
• 11: Douglas B. Lenat, CYC: a large-scale investment in knowledge infrastructure, Communications of the ACM, v.38 n.11, p.33-38, Nov. 1995 [doi>10.1145/219717.219745]
• 12: H. Lieberman, H. Liu, P. Singh, and B. Barry. Beating common sense into interactive applications. AI Magazine, 25(4):63--76, 2004.
• 13: H. Liu , P. Singh, ConceptNet — A Practical Commonsense Reasoning Tool-Kit, BT Technology Journal, v.22 n.4, p.211-226, October 2004 [doi>10.1023/B:BTTJ.0000047600.45421.6d]
• 14: M. Mateas. Expressive AI: A hybrid art and science practice. Leonardo, 34(2):147--153, 2001.
• 15: M. Mateas. Procedural literacy: Educating the new media practitioner. On the Horizon, 13(1), 2005.
• 16: E. T. Mueller. Natural Language Processing with ThoughtTreasure. Signiform, 1998. Online: http://www.signiform.com/tt/book/.
• 17: M. J. Nelson and M. Mateas. Towards automated game design. In AI*IA 2007: Artificial Intelligence and Human-Oriented Computing, pages 626--637. Springer, 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 4733.
• 18: J. Orwant, EGGG: automated programming for game generation, IBM Systems Journal, v.39 n.3-4, p.782-794, July 2000
• 19: R. Ovans and R. Davison. An interactive constraint-based expert assistant for music composition. In Proceedings of the 9th Canadian Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 1992.
• 20: B. Pell. Metagame in symmetric, chess-like games. In L. V. Allis and H. J. van den Herik, editors, Heuristic Programming in Artificial Intelligence 3: The Third Computer Olympiad. Ellis Horwood, 1992.
• 21: E. Rosch. Natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 4:328--350, 1973.
• 22: P. Singh. The public acquisition of commonsense knowledge. In Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium on Acquiring (and Using) Linguistic (and World) Knowledge for Information Access, 2002.
• 23: Ryan Williams , Barbara Barry , Push Singh, ComicKit: acquiring story scripts using common sense feedback, Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces, January 10-13, 2005, San Diego, California, USA [doi>10.1145/1040830.1040907]

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  K. Computing Milieux
  K.8 PERSONAL COMPUTING
      K.8.0 General
          Subjects: Games

Additional Classification:
  D. Software
  D.2 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
        D.2.11 Software Architectures
            Subjects: Domain-specific architectures

  H. Information Systems
  H.5 INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION (I.7)
      H.5.2 User Interfaces (D.2.2, H.1.2, I.3.6)

General Terms:
Design, Human Factors