ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
On the complexity of checking self-duality of polytopes and its relations to vertex enumeration and graph isomorphism
Full text PdfPdf (221 KB)
Source
Annual Symposium on Computational Geometry archive
Proceedings of the twenty-fourth annual symposium on Computational geometry table of contents
College Park, MD, USA
SESSION: 5B table of contents
Pages 192-198  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-071-5
Authors
Hans Raj Tiwary  Universtitaet des Saarlandes, Saarbruecken, Germany
Khaled Elbassioni  Max Planck Institut fuer Informatik, Saarbruecken, Germany
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGGRAPH: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 5,   Downloads (12 Months): 37,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1377676.1377707
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We study the complexity of determining whether a polytope given by its vertices or facets is combinatorially isomorphic to its polar dual. We prove that this problem is Graph Isomorphism hard, and that it is Graph Isomorphism complete if and only if Vertex Enumeration is Graph Isomorphism easy. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first problem that is not equivalent to Vertex Enumeration and whose complexity status has a non-trivial impact on the complexity of Vertex Enumeration irrespective of whether checking Self-duality turns out to be strictly harder than Graph Isomorphism or equivalent to Graph Isomorphism. The constructions employed in the proof yield a class of self-dual polytopes that are interesting on their own. In particular, this class of self-dual polytopes has the property that the facet-vertex incident matrix of the polytope is transposable if and only if the matrix is symmetrizable as well. As a consequence of this construction, we also prove that checking self-duality of a polytope, given by its facet-vertex incidence matrix, is Graph Isomorphism complete, thereby answering a question of Kaibel and Schwartz.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
 
3
E. Boros, V. Gurvich, and I. Zverovich. Neighborhood hypergraphs of bipartite graphs. Technical report, Rutgers Center for Operations Research, 2006.
 
4
D. Bremner, K. Fukuda, and A. Marzetta. Primal - dual methods for vertex and facet enumeration. Discrete & Computational Geometry, 20(3):333--357, 1998.
 
5
J. Erickson. Faces of intricate polytopes. Web Notes: http://compgeom.cs.uiuc.edu/~jeffe/open/intricate.html, 2000.
 
6
R. M. Freund and J. B. Orlin. On the complexity of four polyhedral set containment problems. Mathematical Programming, 33(2):139--145, 1985.
 
7
B. Grünbaum. Convex Polytopes Second Edition prepared by V. Kaibel, V. L. Klee and G. M. Ziegler, volume 221 of Graduate Texts in Mathematics. Springer, 2003.
 
8
B. Grünbaum and G. C. Shephard. Is self-duality involutory? American Mathematical Monthly, 95:729--733, 1988.
 
9
 
10
 
11
V. Kaibel and A. Schwartz. On the complexity of polytope isomorphism problems. Graphs and Combinatorics, 19(2):215--230, 2003.
12
 
13
P. McMullen. The maximum numbers of faces of a convex polytope. Mathematica, 17:179--184, 1970.
 
14
15
 
16
G. M. Ziegler. Lectures on Polytopes, volume 152 of Graduate Texts in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Hans Raj Tiwary: colleagues
Khaled Elbassioni: colleagues