| On the complexity of checking self-duality of polytopes and its relations to vertex enumeration and graph isomorphism |
| Full text |
Pdf
(221 KB)
|
Source
|
Annual Symposium on Computational Geometry
archive
Proceedings of the twenty-fourth annual symposium on Computational geometry
table of contents
College Park, MD, USA
Pages 192-198
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-071-5
|
|
Authors
|
|
| Sponsors |
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 5, Downloads (12 Months): 37, Citation Count: 0
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
We study the complexity of determining whether a polytope given by its vertices or facets is combinatorially isomorphic to its polar dual. We prove that this problem is Graph Isomorphism hard, and that it is Graph Isomorphism complete if and only if Vertex Enumeration is Graph Isomorphism easy. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first problem that is not equivalent to Vertex Enumeration and whose complexity status has a non-trivial impact on the complexity of Vertex Enumeration irrespective of whether checking Self-duality turns out to be strictly harder than Graph Isomorphism or equivalent to Graph Isomorphism. The constructions employed in the proof yield a class of self-dual polytopes that are interesting on their own. In particular, this class of self-dual polytopes has the property that the facet-vertex incident matrix of the polytope is transposable if and only if the matrix is symmetrizable as well. As a consequence of this construction, we also prove that checking self-duality of a polytope, given by its facet-vertex incidence matrix, is Graph Isomorphism complete, thereby answering a question of Kaibel and Schwartz.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
|
| |
2
|
|
| |
3
|
E. Boros, V. Gurvich, and I. Zverovich. Neighborhood hypergraphs of bipartite graphs. Technical report, Rutgers Center for Operations Research, 2006.
|
| |
4
|
D. Bremner, K. Fukuda, and A. Marzetta. Primal - dual methods for vertex and facet enumeration. Discrete & Computational Geometry, 20(3):333--357, 1998.
|
| |
5
|
J. Erickson. Faces of intricate polytopes. Web Notes: http://compgeom.cs.uiuc.edu/~jeffe/open/intricate.html, 2000.
|
| |
6
|
R. M. Freund and J. B. Orlin. On the complexity of four polyhedral set containment problems. Mathematical Programming, 33(2):139--145, 1985.
|
| |
7
|
B. Grünbaum. Convex Polytopes Second Edition prepared by V. Kaibel, V. L. Klee and G. M. Ziegler, volume 221 of Graduate Texts in Mathematics. Springer, 2003.
|
| |
8
|
B. Grünbaum and G. C. Shephard. Is self-duality involutory? American Mathematical Monthly, 95:729--733, 1988.
|
| |
9
|
|
| |
10
|
|
| |
11
|
V. Kaibel and A. Schwartz. On the complexity of polytope isomorphism problems. Graphs and Combinatorics, 19(2):215--230, 2003.
|
 |
12
|
Leonid Khachiyan , Endre Boros , Konrad Borys , Khaled Elbassioni , Vladimir Gurvich, Generating all vertices of a polyhedron is hard, Proceedings of the seventeenth annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete algorithm, p.758-765, January 22-26, 2006, Miami, Florida
[doi> 10.1145/1109557.1109640]
|
| |
13
|
P. McMullen. The maximum numbers of faces of a convex polytope. Mathematica, 17:179--184, 1970.
|
| |
14
|
|
 |
15
|
|
| |
16
|
G. M. Ziegler. Lectures on Polytopes, volume 152 of Graduate Texts in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag.
|
|