ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Low latency wireless ad hoc networking: power and bandwidth challenges and a solution
Full text PdfPdf (334 KB)
Source IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking (TON) archive
Volume 16 ,  Issue 2  (April 2008) table of contents
Pages 335-346  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISSN:1063-6692
Authors
Nima Sarshar  Faculty of Engineering, University of Regina, SK, Canada
Behnam A. Rezaei  Ilial Inc., Los Angeles, CA
Vwani P. Roychowdhury  Department of Electrical Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles, CA
Publisher
IEEE Press  Piscataway, NJ, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 14,   Downloads (12 Months): 218,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: 10.1109/TNET.2007.901079

ABSTRACT

This paper is concerned with the scaling of the number of relay nodes (i.e., hops) individual messages have to transit through in a large-scale wireless ad hoc network (WANET); we call this hop-count as network latency (NL). A large network latency affects all aspects of data communication in a WANET, including an increase in delay, packet loss, and the power needed to process and store messages in nodes lying on the relay path. We consider network management and data routing challenges in WANETs with scalable network latency, e.g., when NL increases only polylogarithmically in the network size. On the physical side, reducing network latency imposes a significantly higher power and bandwidth demand on nodes, and are captured in a set of new bounds derived in this paper. On the protocol front, designing distributed routing protocols that can guarantee the delivery of data packets within a scalable number of hops is a challenging task. To solve this, we introduce multiresolution randomized hierarchy (MRRH), a novel power and bandwidth efficient WANET protocol with scalable network latency. MRRH uses a randomized algorithm for building and maintaining a random hierarchical network topology, which together with the proposed routing algorithm, can guarantee efficient delivery of data packets in the wireless network. For a network of size N, MRRH can provide an average latency of only O(log3 N). The power consumption and bandwidth requirements of MRRH are shown to be nearly optimal for the latency it provides. Therefore, MRRH is a provably efficient candidate for truly large-scale wireless ad hoc networking.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
[1] S. Giordano and I. Stojmenovic, "Position Based Routing Algorithms for Ad Hoc Networks: A Taxonomy," in Ad Hoc Wireless Networking. Boston, MA: Kluwer, 2004, pp. 103-136.
 
2
[2] R. Negi and A. Rajeswaran, "Capacity of power constrained ad hoc networks," in Proc. IEEE INFOCOM, Hong Kong, Mar. 2004.
 
3
[3] R. Nelson and L. Kleinrock, "The spatial capacity of a slotted ALOHA multihop packet radio network with capture," IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. COM-32, no. 6, pp. 684-694, 1984.
 
4
[4] T. C. Hou and V. O. K. Li, "Transmission range control in multihop packet radio networks," IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. COM-34, no. 1, pp. 38-44, 1986.
 
5
[5] H. Takagi and L. Kleinrock, "Optimal transmission ranges for randomly distributed packet radio terminals," IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. COM-32, no. 3, pp. 246-257, 1984.
6
 
7
[7] M. Joa-Ng and I. Lu, "A peer-to-peer zone-based two-level link state routing for mobile ad hoc networks," IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 17, no. 8, pp. 1415-1425, Aug. 1999.
8
9
10
 
11
 
12
[12] P. Gupta and P. R. Kumar, "The capacity of wireless networks," IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 388-404, Mar. 2000.
 
13
[13] R. Meester and R. Roy, Continuum Percolation. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1996.
 
14
[14] P. Gupta and P. R. Kumar, "Critical power for asymptotic connectivity in wireless networks," in Stochastic Analysis, Control, Optimization and Applications: A Volume in Honor of W. H. Fleming, W. M. McEneaney, G. Yin, and Q. Zhang, Eds. Boston, MA: Birkhäuser, 1998.
15
 
16
[16] C. Chou and A. Misra, "Low latency multimedia broadcast in multi-rate wireless meshes," in Proc. 1st IEEE Workshop on Wireless Mesh Networks (WIMESH), Sep. 2005.
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
[20] R. Negi and A. Rajeswaran, "Scheduling and power adaptation for networks in the Ultra Wide Band regime," in Proc. IEEE Globecom, Dallas, TX, Dec. 2004, pp. 139-145.
21
 
22
[22] IEEE Standard for Local and Metropolitan Area Networks: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specification , IEEE Std 802.11-1997.
 
23
 
24
25
 
26
[26] B. A. Rezaei, N. Sarshar, and V. P. Roychowdhury, "Random walks in a dynamic small-world space: Low-latency optimal routing in large-scale sensor networks," ACM Trans. Sensor Networks, 2005, submitted for publication.
27
 
28
[28] S. Banerjee and A. Misra, "Energy efficient reliable communication for multi-hop wireless networks," in Proc. Wireless Networks (WINET'03).
 
29
[29] S. Banerjee and A. Misra, "Adapting transmission power for optimal energy reliable multi-hop wireless communication," in Proc. Wireless Optimization Workshop (WiOpt'03), Sophia-Antipolis, France, Mar. 2003.
 
30
[30] J. Kuruvila, A. Nayak, and I. Stojmenovic, "Hop count optimal position based packet routing algorithms for ad hoc wireless networks with a realistic physical layer," in Proc. IEEE MASS, 2004.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Nima Sarshar: colleagues
Behnam A. Rezaei: colleagues
Vwani P. Roychowdhury: colleagues