ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
PeerChooser: visual interactive recommendation
Full text PdfPdf (688 KB)
Source
Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems archive
Proceeding of the twenty-sixth annual SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems table of contents
Florence, Italy
SESSION: Search table of contents
Pages 1085-1088  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-011-1
Authors
John O'Donovan  University College Dublin, Ireland
Barry Smyth  University College Dublin, Ireland
Brynjar Gretarsson  University of California, Santa Barbara, CA
Svetlin Bostandjiev  University of California, Santa Barbara, CA
Tobias Höllerer  University of California, Santa Barbara, CA
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 16,   Downloads (12 Months): 175,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1357054.1357222
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Collaborative filtering (CF) has been successfully deployed over the years to compute predictions on items based on a user's correlation with a set of peers. The black-box nature of most CF applications leave the user wondering how the system arrived at its recommendation. This note introduces PeerChooser, a collaborative recommender system with an interactive graphical explanation interface. Users are provided with a visual explanation of the CF process and opportunity to manipulate their neighborhood at varying levels of granularity to reflect aspects of their current requirements. In this manner we overcome the problem of redundant profile information in CF systems, in addition to providing an explanation interface. Our layout algorithm produces an exact, noiseless graph representation of the underlying correlations between users. PeerChooser's prediction component uses this graph directly to yield the same results as the benchmark. User's then improve on these predictions by tweaking the graph to their current requirements. We present a user-survey in which PeerChooser compares favorably against a benchmark CF algorithm.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
2
3
4
5
6

Collaborative Colleagues:
John O'Donovan: colleagues
Barry Smyth: colleagues
Brynjar Gretarsson: colleagues
Svetlin Bostandjiev: colleagues
Tobias Höllerer: colleagues