ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Comparing the use of discrete-event simulation and system dynamics models
Full text PdfPdf (24 KB)
Source Winter Simulation Conference archive
Proceedings of the 39th conference on Winter simulation: 40 years! The best is yet to come table of contents
Washington D.C.
SESSION: Poster session: general posters table of contents
Pages 2377-2377  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISBN:1-4244-1306-0
Authors
Antuela A. Tako  University of Warwick, Coventry, U.K.
Stewart Robinson  University of Warwick, Coventry, U.K.
Sponsors
INFORMS-SIM : Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences: Simulation Society
NIST : National Institute of Standards and Technology
(SCS) : The Society for Modeling and Simulation International
ACM/SIGSIM : Association for Computing Machinery: Special Interest Group on Simulation
IIE : Institute of Industrial Engineers
ASA : American Statistical Association
IEEE/SMC : Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers: Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Society
Publisher
IEEE Press  Piscataway, NJ, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 3,   Downloads (12 Months): 62,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  

ABSTRACT

System Dynamics (SD) and Discrete-Event Simulation (DES) are two simulation techniques widely used in Operational Research. Existing literature on how these approaches compare is scarce. The few comparative studies found in the literature are mostly based on the authors' personal opinions. Bringing the end user into the picture can give interesting insights about how differently users perceive DES and SD simulation models. This paper provides an empirical study on the comparison of the two simulation approaches in terms of model use. We used a questionnaire survey with executive MBA students in order to assess how different users find the two simulation approaches in terms of understanding, complexity, model validity, model usefulness and model results. Our results suggest that model users do not perceive any significant differences between a DES and SD model.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Antuela A. Tako: colleagues
Stewart Robinson: colleagues