ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Project planning using an interactive, structured modeling environment
Full text PdfPdf (1.55 MB)
Source Winter Simulation Conference archive
Proceedings of the 39th conference on Winter simulation: 40 years! The best is yet to come table of contents
Washington D.C.
SESSION: Construction engineering and project management: integrated information management table of contents
Pages 2019-2027  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISBN:1-4244-1306-0
Author
Ian Flood  University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
Sponsors
INFORMS-SIM : Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences: Simulation Society
NIST : National Institute of Standards and Technology
(SCS) : The Society for Modeling and Simulation International
ACM/SIGSIM : Association for Computing Machinery: Special Interest Group on Simulation
IIE : Institute of Industrial Engineers
ASA : American Statistical Association
IEEE/SMC : Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers: Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Society
Publisher
IEEE Press  Piscataway, NJ, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 16,   Downloads (12 Months): 110,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  

ABSTRACT

Planning construction projects typically makes use of the activity network based Critical Path Method (CPM), since it is very simple to use and reasonably versatile. Most other planning techniques are either aimed at specialized types of construction work (such as linear scheduling techniques) or are peripheral tools to be used in conjunction with these tools (such as n-D CAD). Discrete-event simulation has also been used for construction planning, and while it is extremely versatile, it lacks the simplicity in use of CPM and so has not been widely adopted within the industry. This paper goes back to first principles, identifying the needs of construction project planning and how existing tools meet (or fail to meet) these requirements. Based on this, it proposes a new modeling paradigm better suited to contemporary construction project planning. The principles of the method are demonstrated with a range of examples from construction.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
AbouRizk, S., Hajjar, D. 1998. "A Framework for Applying Simulation in the Construction Industry." Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 25 (3) 604--617.
 
2
 
3
Flood, I., Issa, RRA., and Liu, W. 2006. "A New Modeling Paradigm for Computer-Based Construction Project Planning", Proc. of Joint International. Conference on Computing and Decision-Making in Civil and Building Engineering, Montreal, Canada, ASCE, June 2006, 11 pp.
 
4
Hajjar, D., and AbouRizk, S. M. 2002. "Unified Modeling Methodology for Construction Simulation." Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE, 128 (2), 174--185.
 
5
 
6
Harris, R. B., and Ioannou, P. G. 1998. "Scheduling Projects with Repeating Activities." Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. ASCE, 124 (4) 269--276.
 
7
 
8
Issa, R. A., Flood, I., and O'Brien, W. (eds.). 2003. 4D CAD and Visualization in Construction: Developments and Applications, A. A. Balkema Publishers, Steenwijk.
 
9
Koo, B., and Fischer, M., 2000. "Feasibility Study of 4D CAD in Commercial Construction." Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE, 126 (4) 251--260.
 
10
Matilla, K. G., and Araham, D. M. 1998. "Linear-Scheduling: past research efforts and future directions." Engineering, Construction, and Architectural Management. Blackwell Science Ltd, 5 (3) 294--303.
 
11
Sawhney, A., AbouRizk, S. M, and Halpin, D. W., 1998. "Construction Project Simulation using CYCLONE.", Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 25, 16--25.