Enabling industrial scale simulation/emulation models

ABSTRACT

OLE Process Control (OPC) is an industry standard that facilitates the communication between PCs and Programmable Logic Controllers (PLC). This communication allows for the testing of control systems with an emulation model. When models require faster and higher volume communications, limitations within OPC prevent this. In this paper an interface is developed to allow high speed and high volume communications between a PC and PLC enabling the emulation of larger and more complex control systems and their models. By switching control of elements within the model between the model engine and the control system it is possible to use the model to validate the system design, test the real world control systems and visualise real world operation.

REFERENCES

• 1: Franz Auinger , Markus Vorderwinkler , Georg Buchtela, Interface driven domain-independent modeling architecture for “soft-commissioning” and “reality in the loop”, Proceedings of the 31st conference on Winter simulation: Simulation---a bridge to the future, p.798-805, December 05-08, 1999, Phoenix, Arizona, United States [doi>10.1145/324138.324504]
• 2: Ezequiel Glinsky , Gabriel Wainer, Modeling and simulation of hardware/software systems with CD++, Proceedings of the 36th conference on Winter simulation, December 05-08, 2004, Washington, D.C.
• 3: Peter H. M. Jacobs , Alexander Verbraeck , William Rengelink, Emulation with DSOL, Proceedings of the 37th conference on Winter simulation, December 04-07, 2005, Orlando, Florida
• 4: Todd LeBaron , Kelly Thompson, Emulation of a material delivery system, Proceedings of the 30th conference on Winter simulation, p.1055-1060, December 13-16, 1998, Washington, D.C., United States
• 5: Ian McGregor, Equipment interface: the relationship between simulation and emulation, Proceedings of the 34th conference on Winter simulation: exploring new frontiers, December 08-11, 2002, San Diego, California
• 6: McGregor, I. and R. A. J. Walters 2001. "Emulation Overview." Via http://www.automod.de/media/doc/Mcgregor.pdf {accessed June 8, 2007}
• 7: Geoff Mueller, Emulation: using emulation to reduce commissioning costs on a high speed bottling line, Proceedings of the 33nd conference on Winter simulation, December 09-12, 2001, Arlington, Virginia
• 8: William Rengelink , Yvo A. Saanen, Equipment interface: improving the quality of controls and reducing costs for on-site adjustments with emulation: an example of emulation in baggage handling, Proceedings of the 34th conference on Winter simulation: exploring new frontiers, December 08-11, 2002, San Diego, California
• 9: Cindy Schiess, Emulation: debug it in the lab --- not on the floor, Proceedings of the 33nd conference on Winter simulation, December 09-12, 2001, Arlington, Virginia
• 10: Harald Schludermann , Thomas Kirchmair , Markus Vorderwinkler, Soft-commissioning: hardware-in-the-loop-based verification of controller software, Proceedings of the 32nd conference on Winter simulation, December 10-13, 2000, Orlando, Florida
• 11: Vedapudi, S. 2001. "Using Mcm to Do Emulation of a Car Assembly Line." Via http://www.automod.de/media/doc/Vedapudi.pdf {accessed June 8, 2007}
• 12: Corné Versteegt , Alexander Verbraeck, Real-time control: the extended use of simulation in evaluating real-time control systems of AGVs and automated material handling systems, Proceedings of the 34th conference on Winter simulation: exploring new frontiers, December 08-11, 2002, San Diego, California
• 13: Whorter, S. M., B. Baker and G. Malan 1997. Simulation System for Control Software Validation. In 1997 SCS Simulation Multiconference, Atlanta.