ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
On stars and Steiner stars
Full text PdfPdf (329 KB)
Source Symposium on Discrete Algorithms archive
Proceedings of the nineteenth annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete algorithms table of contents
San Francisco, California
Pages 1233-1240  
Year of Publication: 2008
Authors
Adrian Dumitrescu  University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, WI
Csaba D. Tóth  University of Calgary, AB, Canada
Sponsors
: SIAM Activity Group on Discrete Mathematics
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
Publisher
Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics  Philadelphia, PA, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 6,   Downloads (12 Months): 58,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  

ABSTRACT

For a set of n points in the plane, a star connects one of the points (the center) to the other n - 1 points by straight line edges, while a Steiner star connects an arbitrary point in the plane to all n input points. The center of the minimum Steiner star, the Weber center, minimizes the sum of distances from the n points. Fekete and Meijer showed that the minimum star is at most √2 times longer than the minimum Steiner star for any finite point configuration in the plane or 3-space. The maximum ratio between the two is conjectured to be 4/π in the plane and 4/3 in three dimensions. Here we improve the upper bound to 1.3999 in the plane, and to √2 - 10-4 in 3-space. Our results also imply improved bounds on the maximum ratios between the minimum star and the maximum matching in two and three dimensions. Our method relies on constructing a suitable discretization for a continuous problem and then using linear programming to optimize over a relatively large set of constraints.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
V. Boltyanski, H. Martini, and V. Soltan, Geometric methods and optimization problems, Kluwer Acad. Publ., 1999.
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
E. J. Cockayne and Z. A. Melzak, Euclidean constructibility in graph-minimization problems, Mathematical Magazine 42 (1969), 206--208.
 
7
Z. Drezner, K. Klamroth, A. Schöbel, and G. O. Wesolowsky, The Weber problem, in Facility Location: Applications And Theory (H. W. Hamacher and Zvi Drezner, eds.), Springer, Berlin, 2002, pp. 1--36.
 
8
A. Dumitrescu and Cs. D. Tóth, Distinct triangle areas in a planar point set, in Proc. 12th Conf. on Integer Prog. and Combin. Optimization (Ithaca, NY, 2007), vol. 4513 of LNCS, Springer, pp. 119--129.
 
9
D. Eppstein, Spanning trees and spanners, in Handbook of Computational Geometry (J.-R. Sack and J. Urrutia, eds.), Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2000, pp. 425--461.
 
10
S. Fekete and H. Meijer, On minimum stars and maximum matchings, Discrete & Computational Geometry 23 (2000), 389--407.
 
11
E. Weiszfeld, Sur le point pour lequel les sommes des distances de n points donné est minimum, Tôhoku Mathematical Journal 34 (1937), 355--386.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Adrian Dumitrescu: colleagues
Csaba D. Tóth: colleagues