|
ABSTRACT
A concept map is a graphical representation of relationships among concepts. Willis and Miertschin suggested the use of technology-based concept mapping as an active learning strategy that can enhance learning and thinking skills, particularly among students native to a digital environment [16]. In addition, modern concept mapping software tools enable instructors and students to create visual navigation structures through complex knowledge domains. The authors find value in visual navigation structures for their relevance to organizing and simplifying learning environments and for their appeal to visual learners. This paper investigates different ways to develop digital interactive concept maps (CMaps) to help students navigate complex knowledge domains, such as the content of a course or a curriculum. CMaps can be used to present information in a nonsequential way or in several different ways, depending on the need. Interactivity enables students to easily locate digital information artifacts pertinent to a concept (media files, slide presentations, web pages, etc.) by clicking on links associated with a CMap node representing the course concept or category. A review of recent literature is provided, different software tools are compared, and the authors document their personal experience. This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 0511672.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
Anderson, O. R., 1992, "Some interrelationships between constructivist models of learning and current neurobiological theory, with implications for science education," Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 19(10), 1037--1058.
|
| |
2
|
Armatas, C., Holt, D., Rice, M.., 2003, "Impacts of an Online-Supported, Resource-Based Learning Environment: Does One Size Fit All?" Distance Education, v 24 no 2, October 2003, 141--158.
|
| |
3
|
CMapTools Knowledge Modeling Kit by Institute for Human Machine Cognition, last accessed 07/02/2007 at http://cmap.ihmc.us.
|
| |
4
|
Derry, S., 1990, "Learning Strategies for Acquiring Useful Knowledge," Dimensions of Thinking and Cognitive Instruction, B. Jones & L. Idol (Eds), Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
|
| |
5
|
E. Georgiadou , S. Hatzipanagos , E. Berki, Resource-based learning and teaching-concerns, conflicts, consensus, community, Proceedings of the ACS/IEEE 2005 International Conference on Computer Systems and Applications, p.878-882, January 03-06, 2005
|
| |
6
|
Inspiration by Inspiration Software Company, last accessed 11/29/2006 at http://www.inspiration.com/productinfo/inspiration/index.cfm.
|
| |
7
|
|
| |
8
|
Byron Marshall , Yiwen Zhang , Hsinchun Chen , Ann Lally , Rao Shen , Edward Fox , Lillian N. Cassel, Convergence of knowledge management and E-learning: the GetSmart experience, Proceedings of the 3rd ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital libraries, May 27-31, 2003, Houston, Texas
|
| |
9
|
MindManager by Mindjet Mindjet, last accessed 11/29/2006 at http://www.mindjet.com.
|
| |
10
|
Novak, J. D. & A. J. Caññas, The Theory Underlying Concept Maps and How to Construct Them, Technical Report IHMC CmapTools 2006--01, Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition, 2006, available at: http://cmap.ihmc.us/Publications/ResearchPapers/TheoryUnderlyingConceptMaps.pdf
|
| |
11
|
Plotnick, E., 1997, "Concept Mapping: A Graphical System for Understanding the Relationship Between Concepts", ERIC Digest. ED407938.
|
| |
12
|
Rakes, G. (1996), "Using the Internet as a tool in a resource-based learning environent. Educational Technology, v 36 no 5, 52--56.
|
| |
13
|
Semantica by Semantic Research, last accessed 11/29/2006 at http://www.semanticresearch.com.
|
| |
14
|
Shen, R., Richardson, R., and Fox, E., "Concept maps as visual interfaces to digital libraries," Poster, ECDL'2003, 17--22 August, Trondheim, Norway.
|
| |
15
|
Shiffrin, R., Börner, K., 2004, "Mapping Knowledge Domains," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences in the United States of America, v 101, suppl 1, pp. 5183--5185.
|
| |
16
|
|
|