|
ABSTRACT
The pervasive themes cited by the IT2005 Information Technology Model Curriculum are system integration, use of abstraction, user advocacy, information assurance, adaptability, professionalism and outstanding interpersonal skills. These are aspects of what we teach that pervade and tie together the IT discipline, aspects whose understanding identifies the IT professional. Pervasive themes can be characterized (Meyer,Land[14]) as transformative (change how students think), irreversible (once understood, are never forgotten), integrative (provide a framework for understanding previous concepts), boundin(serve as discipline boundaries in that understanding them identifies someone as a member of the discipline), troublesome (are difficult to teach and learn). This paper illustrates each of these characteristics using the IT pervasive themes and then proposes that an essential aspect of a pervasive theme is that it has an affective component. That is, in addition to cognitive elements (knowledge and intellectual skills), a pervasive theme includes educational objectives that treat values and attitudes. Just as cognitive objectives have a well-known hierarchy of cognitive difficulty, so also affective objectives have a (less well-known) hierarchy of increasing value commitment in which affective objectives can be placed and classified. This paper discusses the affective component in the IT2005 pervasive themes, how they are specified and classified, and how they are achieved using inculcation, role models, role playing, values clarification and analysis, and educational tasks that include natural affective consequences such as project development for real clients.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
ACM Curriculum 1968. Communications of the ACM, 11, 3, March 1968.
|
| |
2
|
ACM Curriculum'78. Communications of the ACM, 22, 3, March 1979.
|
| |
3
|
ACM and IEEE Computer Society. Computing Curricula 1991. Communications of the ACM, 34, 6, June 1991.
|
| |
4
|
ACM and IEEE Computer Society. Computing Curricula 2001 Computer Science. ACM Journal of Educational Resources in Computing, 1, 3, 2001. (at http://acm.org/education/curric_vols/cc2001.pdf)
|
| |
5
|
ACM and IEEE Computer Society. Computing Curricula 2005. The Overview Report. ACM and IEEE Computer Society, 2005. (at http://www.acm.org/education/curric_vols/CC2005-March06Final.pdf)
|
| |
6
|
ACM Computing Curricula, Information Technology Volume. ACM, 2005. (at http://www.acm.org/education/curric_vols/IT_October_2005.pdf)
|
| |
7
|
ACM and IEEE Computer Society. Computer Engineering 2004. IEEE Computer Society, 2004. (at http://www.acm.org/education/CE-Final Report.pdf)
|
| |
8
|
ACM and IEEE Computer Society. Software Engineering 2004. ACM and IEEE Computer Society, 2004. (at http://sites.computer.org/ccse/)
|
| |
9
|
Bloom, B. S., Mesia, B. B. and Krathwohl, D. R. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Cognitive Domain), New York. David McKay, 1956.
|
 |
10
|
Anna Eckerdal , Robert McCartney , Jan Erik Moström , Mark Ratcliffe , Kate Sanders , Carol Zander, Putting threshold concepts into context in computer science education, Proceedings of the 11th annual SIGCSE conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education, June 26-28, 2006, Bologna, Italy
|
 |
11
|
Jonas Boustedt , Anna Eckerdal , Robert McCartney , Jan Erik Moström , Mark Ratcliffe , Kate Sanders , Carol Zander, Threshold concepts in computer science: do they exist and are they useful?, Proceedings of the 38th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, March 07-11, 2007, Covington, Kentucky, USA
|
| |
12
|
Gorgone, John T. et. al. IS2002, Model Curriculum and Guidelines for Undergraduate Degree Programs in Information Systems. (http://www.acm.org/education/is2002.pdf)
|
| |
13
|
Krathwohl, D. R., Bloom, B. S., & Bertram, B. M. (1964). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, the Classification of Educational Goals. Handbook II: Affective Domain. New York: David McKay Co., Inc.
|
| |
14
|
Meyer, Jan and Ray Land. Threshold Concepts and Troublesome Knowledge: Linkages to Ways of Thinking and Practising within the Disciplines. Occasional Report 4, ETL Project, Universities of Edinburgh, Coventry and Durham, May 2003.
|
 |
15
|
|
| |
16
|
Smith, Patricia and Tillman Ragan. Instructional Design, second edition. John Wiley & Sons, 1999.
|
| |
17
|
Superka, Douglas and Christene Ahrens and Judith Hedstrom. Values Education Sourcebook. 1976.
|
CITED BY 2
|
|
|
Jan Erik Moström , Jonas Boustedt , Anna Eckerdal , Robert McCartney , Kate Sanders , Lynda Thomas , Carol Zander, Concrete examples of abstraction as manifested in students' transformative experiences, Proceeding of the fourth international workshop on Computing education research, p.125-136, September 06-07, 2008, Sydney, Australia
|
|