ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
A framework for detection and measurement of phishing attacks
Full text PdfPdf (230 KB)
Source
Workshop On Rapid Malcode archive
Proceedings of the 2007 ACM workshop on Recurring malcode table of contents
Alexandria, Virginia, USA
SESSION: Threats table of contents
Pages: 1 - 8  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISBN:978-1-59593-886-2
Authors
Sujata Garera  Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
Niels Provos  Google Inc., Mountain View, CA
Monica Chew  Google Inc., Mountain View, CA
Aviel D. Rubin  Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
Sponsors
SIGSAC: ACM Special Interest Group on Security, Audit, and Control
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 39,   Downloads (12 Months): 372,   Citation Count: 2
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   review   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1314389.1314391
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Phishing is form of identity theft that combines social engineering techniques and sophisticated attack vectors to harvest financial information from unsuspecting consumers. Often a phisher tries to lure her victim into clicking a URL pointing to a rogue page. In this paper, we focus on studying the structure of URLs employed in various phishing attacks. We find that it is often possible to tell whether or not a URL belongs to a phishing attack without requiring any knowledge of the corresponding page data. We describe several features that can be used to distinguish a phishing URL from a benign one. These features are used to model a logistic regression filter that is efficient and has a high accuracy. We use this filter to perform thorough measurements on several million URLs and quantify the prevalence of phishing on the Internet today


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Nancy Blachman. Google Guide, Making Searching Even Easier. http://www.googleguide.com/google works.html.
 
2
Neil Chou, Robert Ledesma, Yuka Teraguchi, Dan Boneh, and John Mitchell. Client-side defense against web-based identity theft. In 11th Annual Network and Distributed System Security Symposium (NDSS '04), San Diego, 2004.
 
3
Richard Clayton. Insecure real world authentication protocols (or why is phishing so profitable), 2005. http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/users/rnc1/phishproto.pdf.
 
4
CoreStreet. Spoofstick. http://www.corestreet.com/spoofstick.
5
6
 
7
Rachna Dhamija and J. D. Tygar. Phish and HIPs: Human Interactive Proofs to Detect Phishing Attacks. In Human Interactive Proofs, pages 127--141, 2005.
 
8
Sujata Doshi, Niels Provos, Monica Chew, and Aviel D. Rubin. A Framework for Detection and Measurement of Phishing Attacks. Technical report, Johns Hopkins University, SPAR, December 2006. http://www.cs.jhu.edu/<sdoshi/index_files/phish_measurement.pdf.
 
9
D.W.Hosmer and S. Lemeshow. Applied Logistic Regression. Wiley, New York, USA, 1989.
10
 
11
Google. Webmaster Guidelines. http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=35769.
 
12
Amir Herzberg and Ahmad Gbara. Trustbar: Protecting (even naive) web users from spoofing and phishing attacks. Cryptology ePrint Archive, Report 2004/155, 2004. http://eprint.iacr.org/.
 
13
Markus Jakobsson. Modeling and preventing phishing attacks. Phishing Panel of Financial Cryptography, 2005.
 
14
McAfee. Mcafee siteadvisor. http://www.siteadvisor.com/.
 
15
Microsoft. Microsoft delivers new tools to help reduce spam, 2005. http:// www.wwwcoder.com/main/parentid/282/site/5204/266/default.aspx.
 
16
NetCraft. Netcraft anti-phishing tool bar. http://toolbar.netcraft.com/.
 
17
Lawrence Page, Sergey Brin, Ra jeev Motwani, and Terry Winograd. The PageRank Citation Ranking: Bringing Order to the Web. Technical report, Stanford Digital Library Technologies Project, 1998.
18
 
19
 
20
Blake Ross, Collin Jackson, Nicholas Miyake, Dan Boneh, and John Mitchell. A browser plug-in solution to the unique password problem. In Proceedings of 2005 USENIX Security Symposium, 2005.
 
21
Fritz Schneider, Niels Provos, Raphael Moll, Monica Chew, and Brian Rakowski. Phishing Protection Design Documentation, 2006. http://wiki.mozilla.org/Phishing Protection: Design Documentation.
 
22
Sophos. Do-it-yourself phishing kits found on the internet, reveals sophos, 2004. http://www.sophos.com/pressoffice/news/articles/2004/08/sa diyphishing.html.
 
23
24
 
25
Yue Zhang, Serge Egelman, Lorrie Faith Cranor, and Jason Hong. Phinding Phish: Evaluating Anti-Phishing Tools.



REVIEW

"Barrett Hazeltine : Reviewer"

Several features are identified that can be used to distinguish a phishing uniform resource locator (URL). High accuracy (97.31 percent) is achieved by a logistic regression filter based on these features. An advantage of feature-based tests over   more...

Collaborative Colleagues:
Sujata Garera: colleagues
Niels Provos: colleagues
Monica Chew: colleagues
Aviel D. Rubin: colleagues