ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
A terminal-assisted route optimized NEMO management
Full text PdfPdf (304 KB)
Source
MOBIWAC archive
Proceedings of the 5th ACM international workshop on Mobility management and wireless access table of contents
Chania, Crete Island, Greece
SESSION: Mobility and control management table of contents
Pages: 84 - 90  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISBN:978-1-59593-809-1
Authors
Teck Meng Lim  Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore
Bu-Sung Lee  Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore
Chai Kiat Yeo  Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore
Juki Wirawan Tantra  Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore
Sponsors
SIGSIM: ACM Special Interest Group on Simulation and Modeling
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 4,   Downloads (12 Months): 29,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1298091.1298106
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The NEMO basic support protocol enhances mobile IPv6 (MIPv6) to enable mobile router (MR) to move together with mobile network node (MNN) as a unit. This protocol suffers from pinball routing effect which has triggered research works to enable direct routing between MNNs in the presence of network mobility. Instead of relying on MIPv6, this paper describes network mobility using a novel terminal-assisted IP mobility protocol on MNNs that work cooperatively with MRs and access routers to provide seamless connectivity. This protocol is superior as it neither suffers from pinball routing effect nor requires dedicated infrastructure support such as home agent. It also does not dynamically increase the size of IP header. Through quantitative comparisons with existing protocol, this protocol triumphs in terms of average packet delivery overhead and packet generation.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
V. Devarapalli, R. Wakikawa, A. Petrescu, and P. Thubert. Network Mobility (NEMO) Basic Support Protocol. RFC 3963, Jan. 2005.
 
2
 
3
D. Johnson, C. Perkins, and J. Arkko. Mobililty Support in IPv6. RFC 3775, June 2004.
 
4
B. S. Lee, T. M. Lim, C. K. Yeo, and Q. V. Le. Terminal Mobility Support Protocol. In Proc. IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications, Glasgow, Scotland, UK, June 8--12, 2007.
 
5
T. M. Lim, B. S. Lee, and C. K. Yeo. IPv6 Network Mobility for Flat Ad hoc Routing Protocol. In Proc. IEEE International Conference on Global Telecommunications, St. Louis, USA, Nov. 28--2, 2005.
 
6
C. Ng, P. Thubert, M. Watari, and F. Zhao. Network Mobility Route Optimization Problem Statement. Internet Draft, Sept. 2006. Working in Progress.
 
7
 
8
 
9
P. Thubert and M. Molteni. IPv6 Reverse Routing Header and its application to Mobile Networks. Internet Draft, Sept. 2006. Working in Progress.
 
10

Collaborative Colleagues:
Teck Meng Lim: colleagues
Bu-Sung Lee: colleagues
Chai Kiat Yeo: colleagues
Juki Wirawan Tantra: colleagues