ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Designing markets for open source production of digital culture goods
Full text PdfPdf (497 KB)
Source
ACM International Conference Proceeding Series; Vol. 258 archive
Proceedings of the ninth international conference on Electronic commerce table of contents
Minneapolis, MN, USA
SESSION: Session T4: new dimensions of IT-enabled business value table of contents
Pages: 283 - 292  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISBN:978-1-59593-700-1
Authors
Karl R. Lang  Baruch College: City University of New York (CUNY), New York, NY
Di Shang  Baruch College: City University of New York (CUNY), New York, NY
Roumen Zicklin  Baruch College: City University of New York (CUNY), New York, NY
Sponsors
SIGART: ACM Special Interest Group on Artificial Intelligence
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGEcom: ACM Special Interest Group on Electronic Commerce
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 2,   Downloads (12 Months): 55,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1282100.1282155
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Digital culture products are easily reproduced, easily distributed, and subject to endless transmutation, extension and recombination. This sets the stage for the emergence of maturing markets for open source modes of cultural content production. This paper explores two previously unstudied structures of such markets. First, we consider a market that offers products with content access and transmutation rights to consumers and lets them personalize products in the post-purchase environment. Second, we consider an open source production model where producers can trade content access rights that let other producer reuse their content in their own production process. Our experimental results show that, as predicted by theory, total surplus under both options is larger than under the no-tradable- transmutation-rights option. The presence of open source access and transmutation rights diffuses monopoly power without hurting producers. profits. The paper also provides a basic experimental framework for testing many other alternative copyright arrangements and provides further understanding of issues related to the production and exchange of digital information goods.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Aghion P., and Howitt, P. (1999), Endogenous Growth Theory, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
 
2
Alderman, J. (2001). Sonic Boom: Napster, P2P and the Battle for the Future of Music. London: Fourth Estate.
 
3
Arrow, K. (1962). "The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing." The Review of Economic Studies, 29(3): pp. 155--173.
 
4
Bakos, Y., Brynjolfson, E., & Lichtman, D. (1999). "Shared Information Goods", Journal of Law and Economics, 42(1), 117--155.
 
5
Bikhchandani, S. & Mamer, J. "Competitive equilibrium in an Exchange Economy with Indivisibilities" Journal of Economic Theory, v74 1997, pg. 385--413.
 
6
Boldrin, M. & Levine, D. (2002). "The Case Against Intellectual Property." American Economic Review, 92(2): pp. 209--212.
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
Farrell, J. & Shapiro, C., (2004). Intellectual Property, competition, and information technology, in H. R. Varian, J. Farrell, and C. Shapiro (eds.), The Economics of Information Technology, Cambridge University Press, pp. 49--87.
 
11
 
12
 
13
Hughes, J. & Lang, K. R. (2006). "Open Source Culture and Digital Remix: A Theoretical Framework." Forthcoming in Journal of Management Information Systems, 23(2), Fall 2006.
 
14
Hui, K. & Png, I. (2002). "On the Supply of Creative Work: Evidence from the Movies." American Economic Review, 92(2): pp. 217--220.
 
15
Katz, M. (2004). Capturing Sound: How Technology Has Changed Music, University of California Press: Berkeley, California.
 
16
 
17
Klein, B., Lerner, A. & Murphy, K. (2002). "The Economics of Copyright 'Fair Use' in a Networked World." American Economic Review, 92(2): pp. 205--208.
 
18
Krishnan, R, Michael D. Smith, M. D., & Telang R. (2003), The Economics of Peer-to-Peer Networks, Journal of Information Technology Theory and Applications, 5(3), 31--44, 2003.
 
19
Landes, W. & Posner, R. (1989). "An Economic Analysis of Copyright Law", Journal of Legal Studies, 18(2), pp. 325--363.
 
20
 
21
Lessig, L. 2004. Free Culture, Penguin Press: New York.
 
22
Liebowitz, S. (1985). "Copying and Indirect Appropriability: Photocopying of Journals", Journal of Political Economy, 93(5), pp. 945--957.
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
Romer, P. (1986). "Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth." Journal of Political Economy, 94(5): pp.1002--1037.
 
27
Romer, P. (1990), "Endogenous Technological Change." Journal of Political Economy, 98(5.2), S71--S102.
 
28
Romer, P. (2002). "When should we use intellectual property rights?," American Economic Review, 92(2): pp. 213--216.
 
29
Smith, Vernon L. "An Experimental Study of Competitive Market Behavior" The Journal of Political Economy, v20 n2, 1962, pg. 111--137.
 
30
Smith, Vernon L. "Experimental Economics: Induced Value Theory" American Economic Review, v66, n2, Papers and Proceedings of the Eighty-eighth Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association (May, 1976), pp. 274--279.
 
31
Smith, Vernon L. "Constructivist and Ecological Rationality in Economics" American Economic Review, v93 n3, June 2003, pg. 465--508.
 
32
Solow, R. (1988). "Growth Theory and After." The American Economic Review, 79(3): pp. 303--317.
 
33
Vaidhyanathan, S. (2001). Copyrights and Copywrongs. New York University Press: New York.
 
34
Vaidhyanathan, S. (2004). Anarchist in the Library, Basic Books: New York.
 
35
Varian, H. R. (2000). "Buying, Sharing, and Renting Information Goods", Journal of Industrial Economics, 48(4), pp. 473--488.
 
36
Weitzman, M. L. (1998), Recombinant Growth, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 43(2), 330.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Karl R. Lang: colleagues
Di Shang: colleagues
Roumen Zicklin: colleagues