ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Perception and acceptance of fingerprint biometric technology
Full text PdfPdf (31 KB)
Source
ACM International Conference Proceeding Series; Vol. 229 archive
Proceedings of the 3rd symposium on Usable privacy and security table of contents
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
POSTER SESSION: Posters table of contents
Pages: 153 - 154  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISBN:978-1-59593-801-5
Authors
Rosa R. Heckle  UMBC, Baltimore, MD
Andrew S. Patrick  National Research Council, Ottawa, ON, Canada
Ant Ozok  UMBC, Baltimore, MD
Sponsor
: CyLab
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 24,   Downloads (12 Months): 160,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1280680.1280704
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The acceptance of biometric security services appears to be affected by several factors, one of which may be the context in which it is used. In this study, 24 participants were asked to roleplay the use of a fingerprint biometric identification system when making purchases at an online bookstore. The results show differences in opinions about the biometric system when the perceived benefits for the users were manipulated. Participants were more comfortable using biometrics, and considered them more beneficial, when they were used to secure personal information for personal purchases, in contrast to securing personal information for corporate purchases. The results suggest that application contexts with obvious, apparent benefits to the user tend to lead to greater perceptions of usability and higher acceptance rates than contexts where there are only system or corporate benefits...


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Coventry, L. (2005). Usable biometrics. In L. F. Cranor and S. Garfinkel (Eds.), Security and Usability: Designing secure systems that people can use., O'Reilly Media, Inc.
 
2
Moody, J. (2004). Public perceptions of biometric devices: The effect of misinformation on acceptance and use. Journal of Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, 1, 753--761.
 
3
Collaborative Colleagues:
Rosa R. Heckle: colleagues
Andrew S. Patrick: colleagues
Ant Ozok: colleagues