ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Author feedback experiment at PAM 2007
Full text PdfPdf (147 KB)
Source
ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review archive
Volume 37 ,  Issue 3  (July 2007) table of contents
COLUMN: Editorial zone table of contents
Pages: 73 - 78  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISSN:0146-4833
Author
Konstantina Papagiannaki  Intel Research
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 1,   Downloads (12 Months): 13,   Citation Count: 3
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1273445.1273456
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This editorial article is put together to disseminate the experience gained through the author feedback experiment, performed at the 2007 Passive and Active Measurement (PAM) conference.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
A. G. Greenwald and G. M. Gillmore. Grading leniency is a removable contaminant of student ratings. American Psychologist, 52:1209--1217, 1997.
 
2
M. Huemer. Student evaluations: A critical review. http://home.sprynet.com/~owl1/sef.htm.
 
3
S. Keshav. Reviewing the reviewers, September 2006. http://keshav-essays.blogspot.com/2006/09/reviewing-reviewers.html.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Konstantina Papagiannaki: colleagues