Failure rates in introductory programming

ABSTRACT

It is a common conception that CS1 is a very difficult course and that failure rates are high. However, until now there has only been anecdotal evidence for this claim. This article reports on a survey among institutions around the world regarding failure rates in introductory programming courses. The article describes the design of the survey and the results. The number of institutions answering the call for data was unfortunately rather low, so it is difficult to make firm conclusions. It is our hope that this article can be the starting point for a systematic collection of data in order to find solid proof of the actual failure and pass rates of CS1.

REFERENCES

• 1: ACEC'04. Proceedings of the Australian Computers in education 2004 conference, Adelaide, Australia July 5--8, 2004.
• 2: S. Bergin and R. Reilly. The influence of motivation and comfort-level on learning to program. In Proceedings of the 17th Annual Workshop og the Psychology of Programming Interest Group pages 293--304, University of Sussex, Brighton UK 29 June - 1 July, 2005. University of Sussex,
• 3: Kim B. Bruce, Controversy on how to teach CS 1: a discussion on the SIGCSE-members mailing list, ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, v.37 n.2, June 2005 [doi>10.1145/1083431.1083477]
• 4: M. E. Caspersen & J. Bennedsen. Questionnaire for Failure Rates for Introductory Programming Courses. (Last accessed February 9, 2007) http://www.daimi.au.dk/~jbb/questFail.html
• 5: G. Engel & E. Roberts. Computing Curricula 2001 Computer Science, Final Report. (Last accessed March 10, 2006) http://www.computer.org/portal/cms_docs_ieeecs/ieeecs/education/cc2001/cc2001.pdf
• 6: Mark Guzdial , Andrea Forte, Design process for a non-majors computing course, Proceedings of the 36th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, February 23-27, 2005, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
• 7: Brian Hanks , Charlie McDowell , David Draper , Milovan Krnjajic, Program quality with pair programming in CS1, Proceedings of the 9th annual SIGCSE conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education, June 28-30, 2004, Leeds, United Kingdom
• 8: ICALT'04. Proceedings IEEE international conference on Advanced learning technologies. Joensuu, Finland 30 August - 1 September, 2004. IEEE Computer Society,
• 9: iMahal. Find Computer Science Colleges and Universities in USA (Last accessed February 1, 2007) http://www.imahal.com/education/usa/cs/list.htm
• 10: ITiCSE'05. Proceedings of the 10th annual conference on innovation and technology in computer science education. Monte de Caparica, Portugal June 27--29, 2005.
• 11: T. Jenkins. On the Difficulty of Learning tp Program. In Proceedings for the 3rd Annual conference of the LTSN Centre for Information and Computer Sciences, Loughborough, UK August 27 -- 29, 2002.
• 12: A Korhonen and L. Malmi. . Kolin Kolistelut - Koli Calling 2004: Proceedings of the fourth Finnish/Baltic Sea Conference on Computer Science Education. Helsinki University of Technology, Department of Computer Science and Technology, Helsinki, Finland, 2004.
• 13: S. Lohr. Microsoft, Amid Dwindling Interest, Talks Up Computing as a Career. In http://www.nytimes.com/2004/03/01/technology/01bill.html?ex=1170478800&en=14c1251e099cf4cd&ei=5070 March 1, 2004.
• 14: A Robins, J. Rountree and N. Rountree. Learning and Teaching Programming: A Review and Discussion. Journal of Computer Science Education, 13(2):137--172, 2003.
• 15: SIGCSE'05. SIGCSE '05: Proceedings of the 36th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education. St. Louis, Missouri, USA, 2005.
• 16: UNESCO. UNESCO Institute of Statistics. (Last accessed January 20, 2007); http://stats.uis.unesco.org/TableViewer/dimView.aspx?ReportId=251

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  K. Computing Milieux
  K.3 COMPUTERS AND EDUCATION
      K.3.2 Computer and Information Science Education
          Subjects: Computer science education

Keywords:
CS1, failure rate, introductory programming, pass rate