ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Strangers, enemies, terms and taxonomies
Full text PdfPdf (228 KB)
Source
ACM SIGCSE Bulletin archive
Volume 39 ,  Issue 2  (June 2007) table of contents
COLUMN: CS research table of contents
Pages: 12 - 13  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISSN:0097-8418
Author
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 3,   Downloads (12 Months): 10,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1272848.1272856
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

It may be apocryphal, but I have been told that in some spoken languages the word for "stranger" is also the word for "enemy" -- to fail to make such a distinction must constrain one's behavior toward strangers. Likewise, our thinking on educational issues is constrained when we unaware of important distinctions. In the following paragraphs, I provide a potpourri of some my favorite terms and taxonomies that make important educational distinctions. I make no claim that these are the most useful distinctions. Instead, I merely seek to illustrate the importance of making distinctions.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Au, C. and Entwistle, N. (1999) 'Memorisation with understanding' in approaches to studying: cultural variant or response to assessment demands? http://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/documents/00001728.htm {January 2007}
 
2
Ausubel, D. P. (1963) The Psychology of Meaningful Verbal Learning. London: Grune & Stratton.
 
3
Biggs, J. (1999) Teaching for Quality Learning at University Buckingham: SRHE and Open University Press.
 
4
Biggs J, Kember D. and Leung D. (2001) The revised two-factor Study Process Questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F. British Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 71, No. 1 (March), pp. 133--149
 
5
Bloom, B. S. (Ed.) (1956) "Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: Handbook I: Cognitive Domain", Longmans, Green and Company.
 
6
Dweck, C. and Leggett, E. (1988) A Social-Cognitive Approach to Motivation and Personality. Psychological Review. Vol. 95, No. 2, pp. 256--273.
 
7
Dweck, C. (1999) Self-Theories: Their Role in Motivation, Personality, and Development. Taylor and Francis.
 
8
Dweck, C. and Sorich, L. (1999) Mastery-Oriented Thinking. In C. R. Snyder (Ed.), Coping: The Psychology of What Works. New York: Oxford University Press.
 
9
 
10
Krathwohl, D. R., Bloom, B. S., & Bertram, B. M. (1973). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, the Classification of Educational Goals. Handbook II: Affective Domain. New York: David McKay Co., Inc.
11
 
12
Nisbett, R. (2003) The Geography of Thought. New York: Free Press ---or--- London: Nicholas Brealey.
 
13
Schwartzman, L. (2006) A Qualitative Analysis of Reflective and Defensive Student Responses in a Software Engineering and Design Course. The "Koli Calling" Conference: The 6th Baltic Sea Conference on Computing Education Research. Koli, Joensuu, Finland, November 9 -- 12.
 
14
Shulman, L. (2004) "Making Differences: A Table of Learning". In Shulman, L. (edited by Hutchings) "Teaching as Community Property: Essays on Higher Education". Jossey-Bass, San Francisco. pp 64--80.
15