A collection of kinesthetic learning activities for a course on distributed computing: ACM SIGACT news distributed computing column 26

ABSTRACT

Kinesthetic learning is a process where students learn by actively carrying out physical activities rather than by passively listening to lectures. Pedagogical research has indicated that kinesthetic learning is a fundamental, powerful, and ubiquitous learning style. It resonates with many students across all disciplines and levels of education. The adoption of kinesthetic approaches in college classrooms, however, has been hampered by the difficulty of designing effective activities, as well as the perceived challenges of coordinating these activities. On the other hand, courses on distributed computing, by the very nature of the material they cover, are uniquely suited to exploiting this learning technique. We have developed and piloted a collection of kinesthetic activities for a senior undergraduate or graduate-level course on distributed systems. We give detailed descriptions of these exercises and discuss factors that contribute to their success (or failure). Our hope is that others will adopt these particular activities in their own distributed systems courses as well as use these examples as a pattern for developing new activities.

REFERENCES

• 1: {ANH78} David P. Ausubel, Joseph D. Novak, and Helen Hanesian. Educational Psychology: A Cognitive View. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 2nd edition, 1978.
• 2: {BEH+56} B. S. Bloom, M. D. Engelhart, H. H. Hill, E. J. Furst, and D. R. Krathwhol, editors. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. The Classification of Educational Goals, Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. David McKay Company, Inc, New York, 1956.
• 3: Andrew Begel , Daniel D. Garcia , Steven A. Wolfman, Kinesthetic learning in the classroom, Proceedings of the 35th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, March 03-07, 2004, Norfolk, Virginia, USA
• 4: {BJY99} Robert Borchert, Daniel Jensen, and David Yates. Development and assessment of hands-on and visualization modules for enhancement of learning in mechanics. In ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition: Engineering: Education to Serve the World, pages 20--23, Charlotte, NC, June 1999.
• 5: P. Bucci , T. J. Long , B. W. Weide , J. Hollingsworth, Toys are us: presenting mathematical concepts in CS1/CS2, Proceedings of the 30th Annual Frontiers in Education, p.F4B/1-F4B/6, October 18-21, 2000
• 6: {Bon96} Charles C. Bonwell. Enhancing the lecture: Revitalizing the traditional format. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 67:31--44, Fall 1996.
• 7: {BWF07} Tim Bell, Ian H. Witten, and Mike Fellows. Computer science unplugged. URL www.unplugged.canterbury.ac.nz, 2007.
• 8: {Cas85} William E. Cashin. Improving lectures. IDEA paper No. 14, Kansas State University, Center for Faculty Evaluation and Development, 1623 Anderson Avenue, Manhattan, KS 66502--4098, September 1985.
• 9: K. Mani Chandy, Parallel program design: a foundation, Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, MA, 1988
• 10: Martha E. Crosby , Jan Stelovsky, From multimedia instruction to multimedia evaluation, Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, v.4 n.2-3, p.147-162, 1995
• 11: {Dai94} B. Daily. Multimedia and its impact on training engineers. International Journal of Human Computer Interaction, 6(2): 191--204, 1994.
• 12: Edsger W. Dijkstra, Self-stabilizing systems in spite of distributed control, Communications of the ACM, v.17 n.11, p.643-644, Nov. 1974 [doi>10.1145/361179.361202]
• 13: {Dij85} Edsger W. Dijkstra. On anthropomorphism in science. EWD936, available at http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/EWD/ewd09xx/EWD936.PDF, September 1985.
• 14: {Dol00} Shlomi Dolev. Self-Stabilization. MIT Press, 2000.
• 15: Edsger W. Dijkstra , Carel S. Scholten, Predicate calculus and program semantics, Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., New York, NY, 1990
• 16: {FB05} Richard M. Felder and Rebecca Brent. Understanding student differences. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1):57--72, 2005.
• 17: {Fel93} Richard M. Felder. Reaching the second tier---learning and teaching styles in college science education. Journal of College Science Teaching, 22(5):286--290, March--April 1993.
• 18: {FKM03} Heather Fry, Steve Ketteridge, and Stephanie Marshall, editors. A Handbook for Teaching & Learning in Higher Education. Routledge (UK), 2003.
• 19: {Fle02} Neil D. Fleming. VARK---A guide to learning styles, www.vark-learn.com, 2002.
• 20: {FS88} Richard M. Felder and Linda K. Silverman. Learning and teaching styles in engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 78(7):674--681, 1988.
• 21: {Gri81} David Gries. The Science of Programming. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. Springer-Verlag, 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, New York 10010, 1981.
• 22: {Gri94} Susan Griss. Creative movement: A language for learning. Educational Leadership, 51(5):78--80, February 1994.
• 23: {Hak98} Richard R. Hake. Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1):64--74, January 1998.
• 24: {HD78} James Hartley and Ivor K. Davies. Note-taking: A critical review. Programmed Learning and Educational Technology, 15(3):207--224, August 1978.
• 25: {Her89} Ned Herrmann. The Creative Brain. Ned Herrmann Group, revised edition, 1989.
• 26: {Jun92} C. G. Jung. Psychological Types. Routledge, 1992. Original work published in 1921.
• 27: {Kol83} David A. Kolb. Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1983.
• 28: {LD06} Heidi L. Lujan and Stephen E. DiCarlo. First-year medical students prefer multiple learning styles. Advances in Physiology Education, 30(1):13--16, March 2006.
• 29: {LL95} M. Lumsdaine and E. Lumsdaine. Thinking preferences of engineering students: Implications for curriculum restructuring. Journal of Engineering Education, 84(2):193--204, April 1995.
• 30: {McC90} M. H. McCaulley. The MBTI and individual pathways in engineering design. Engineering Education, 80(5):537--542, 1990.
• 31: {MMQH98} Isabel Briggs Myers, Mary H. McCaulley, Naomi L. Quenk, and Allen L. Hammer. MBTI Manual: A Guide to the Development and Use of the Myers-Briggs Type indicator. Consulting Psychologists Press, 3rd edition, 1998.
• 32: {Ros87} Colin P. Rose. Accelerated Learning. Dell, December 1987.
• 33: {Ros99} P. Rosati. Specific differences and similarities in the learning preferences of engineering students. In Frontiers in Education Conference, volume 2, pages 12c1--17, 1999.
• 34: Mimi M. Recker , Ashwin Ram , Terry Shikano , George Li , John Stasko, Cognitive media types for multimedia information access, Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, v.4 n.2-3, p.183-210, 1995
• 35: Paolo A. G. Sivilotti , Murat Demirbas, Introducing middle school girls to fault tolerant computing, Proceedings of the 34th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, February 19-23, 2003, Reno, Navada, USA
• 36: Paolo A. G. Sivilotti , Scott M. Pike, The suitability of kinesthetic learning activities for teaching distributed algorithms, Proceedings of the 38th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, March 07-11, 2007, Covington, Kentucky, USA
• 37: {Sti87} J. E. Stice. Using Kolb's learning cycle to improve student learning. Engineering Education, 77(5):291--296, February 1987.
• 38: {Zim03} Virginia Zimmerman. Moving poems: Kinesthetic learning in the literature classroom. Pedagogy, 2(3): 409--412, 2003.
• 39: {Zyw03} Malgorzata S. Zywno. A contribution to validation of score meaning for Felder-Soloman's index of learning styles. American Society for Engineering Education, 2003.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  K. Computing Milieux
  K.3 COMPUTERS AND EDUCATION
      K.3.2 Computer and Information Science Education

Additional Classification:
  K. Computing Milieux
  K.3 COMPUTERS AND EDUCATION
      K.3.1 Computer Uses in Education