ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Addressing security in medical sensor networks
Full text PdfPdf (184 KB)
Source
International Conference On Mobile Systems, Applications And Services archive
Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGMOBILE international workshop on Systems and networking support for healthcare and assisted living environments table of contents
San Juan, Puerto Rico
SESSION: Access and security table of contents
Pages: 7 - 12  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISBN:978-1-59593-767-4
Authors
Kriangsiri Malasri  University of Memphis
Lan Wang  University of Memphis
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGMOBILE: ACM Special Interest Group on Mobility of Systems, Users, Data and Computing
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 14,   Downloads (12 Months): 195,   Citation Count: 2
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1248054.1248058
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We identify the security challenges facing a sensor network for wireless health monitoring, and propose an architecture called "SNAP" (Sensor Network for Assessment of Patients) to address these challenges. SNAP protects the privacy, authenticity, and integrity of medical data, with low-cost energy-efficient mechanisms. We have incorporated the following mechanisms in SNAP: (1)an ECC-based secure key exchange protocol to set up shared keys between sensor nodes and base stations; (2)symmetric encryption and decryption for protecting data con?dentiality and integrity; (3) a two-tier authentication scheme for verifying data source. We have developed a prototype on the Tmote Sky platform for evaluating the proposed architecture and mechanisms.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Fujitsu MBF200 Solid State Fingerprint Sensor. http://www.fujitsu.com/emea/services/microelectronics/sensors/.
 
2
Certicom Research. Standards for Efficient Cryptography (SEC)1: Elliptic Curve Cryptography. Sept. 2000.
 
3
Certicom Research. Standards for Efficient Cryptography (SEC)2: Recommended Elliptic Curve Domain Parameters. Sept. 2000.
 
4
D. Chaum and E. van Heijst. Group Signatures. In Advances in Cryptology - Eurocrypt '91 pages 257--265, 1991.
 
5
Crossbow Solutions Newsletter. Motes for mobile communication and tele-medicine. 2005.
 
6
Crossbow Technology. MPR/MIB mote hardware users manual. http://www.xbow.com/Support/manuals.htm,Jan. 2006.
 
7
D. Eastlake and P. Jones. US Secure Hash Algorithm 1. RFC 3174, http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3174.txt,Sept.2001.
 
8
R. Fischer, L. Ohno-Machado, D. Curtis, R. Greenes, T. Stair, and J. Guttag. SMART: Scalable medical alert response technology. In Smart Medical Technologies Summit (SMT) 2004.
 
9
N. Gura, A. Patel, A. Wander, H. Eberle, and S. C. Shantz. Comparing Elliptic Curve Cryptography and RSA on 8-bit CPUs. In Workshop on Cryptographic Hardware and Embedded Systems Aug. 2004.
 
10
H. Wang and B. Sheng and Q. Li. TelosB implementation of elliptic curve cryptography over primary ?eld. Technical Report WM-CS-2005-12, Dept. of Computer Science, College of William and Mary, Oct. 2005.
 
11
H. G. Hosseini, D. Luo, and K. J. Reynolds. The Comparison of Different Feed Forward Neural Network Architectures for ECG Signal Diagnosis.Medical Engineering and Physics 28:372--378, 2006.
 
12
S. A. Israel, J. M. Irvine, A. Cheng, M. D. Wiederhold, and B. K. Wiederhold. ECG to identify individuals. Pattern Recognition 38:133--142, 2005.
 
13
B. Kaliski. PKCS #5: Password-Based Cryptography Specification. RFC 2898, http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2898.txt, Sept. 2000.
 
14
H. Krawczyk, M. Bellare, and R. Canetti. HMAC: Keyed-Hashing for Message Authentication. RFC 2104, http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2104.txt,Feb.1997.
 
15
A. Liu, P. Kampanakis, and P. Ning. TinyECC: Elliptic Curve Cryptography for Sensor Networks. http://discovery.csc.ncsu.edu/software/TinyECC/.
 
16
Moteiv Corporation. Tmote Sky. http://www.moteiv.com/products/tmotesky.php,2007.
 
17
C. Park, P. H. Chou,Y. Bai, R. Matthews, and A. Hibbs. An Ultra-Wearable, Wireless, Low Power ECG Monitoring System. Proceedings of IEEE BioCAS Nov. 2006.
 
18
A. Perrig, R. Szewczyk, V. Wen, D. Culler, and J. D. Tygar. SPINS: Security protocols for sensor networks. In Proceedings of the ACM MOBICOM 2001.
 
19
S. C. Shantz. From Euclid's GCD to Montgomery Multiplication to the Great Divide. Technical Report TR-2001--95, Sun Microsystems, June 2001.
 
20
V. Shnayder, B.-R. Chen, K. Lorincz, T. R. F. Fulford-Jones, and M. Welsh. Sensor networks for medical care. Technical Report TR-08-05, Harvard University, Apr. 2005.
 
21
Q. Wang, W. Shin, X. Liu, Z. Zeng, C. Oh, B. Al-Shebli, M. Caccamo, C. Gunter, E. Gunter, J. Hou, K. Karahalios, and L. Sha. I-Living: An open system architecture for assisted living. In Proceedings of the IEEE SMC 2006.
 
22
A. Wood, G. Virone, T. Doan, Q. Cao, L. Selavo, Y. Wu, L. Fang, Z. He, S. Lin, and J. Stankovic. ALARM-NET: Wireless Sensor Networks for Assisted-Living and Health Monitoring. Technical Report CS-2006--01, University of Virginia, 2006.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Kriangsiri Malasri: colleagues
Lan Wang: colleagues