ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Investigating response similarities between real and mediated social touch: a first test
Full text PdfPdf (182 KB)
Source
Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems archive
CHI '07 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems table of contents
San Jose, CA, USA
SESSION: Work-in-progress table of contents
Pages: 2405 - 2410  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISBN:978-1-59593-642-4
Authors
Antal Haans  Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, AE, Netherlands
Christiaan de Nood  Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, AA, Netherlands
Wijnand A. IJsselsteijn  Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, AA, Netherlands
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 5,   Downloads (12 Months): 48,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1240866.1241015
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we investigate whether the gender differences generally found in same and opposite sex social touch are also present in mediated situations. Participants were led to believe that a male or female stranger was remotely touching them by means of a vest equipped with vibrotactile actuators. Affective responses varied with the stimulated body location, but the effect of dyad composition was not significant. In sum, we found partial support for the assumption that mediated social touch is actually perceived of as a real touch. Possible improvements to haptic communication devices are discussed.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Andersen, P.A. and Leibowitz, K. The development and nature of the construct touch avoidance. Environmental Psychology and Nonverbal Behavior, 3, 2 (1978), 89--106.
 
2
Argyle, M. Bodily communication. International Universities Press, New York, 1975.
3
4
 
5
Brave, S., Nass, C. and Sirinian, E. Force-feedback in computer-mediated communication. Proc HCI International 2001, Vol. 3, Lawrence Erlbaum (2001), 145--149.
6
 
7
Crusco, A.H. and Wetzel, C.G. The Midas touch: the effects of interpersonal touch on restaurant tipping. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 10, 4 (1984), 512--517.
 
8
Derlega, V.J., Lewis, R.J., Harrison, S., Winstead, B.A. and Costanza, R. Gender differences in the initiation and attribution of tactile intimacy. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 13, 2 (1989), 83--96.
 
9
Floyd, K. Affectionate same-sex touch: The influence of homophobia on observers' perceptions. Journal of Social Psychology, 140, 6 (2000), 774--788.
 
10
Guéguen, N. Kind of touch and compliance with a request. Studia Psychologica, 44, 2 (2002), 167--172.
 
11
 
12
Heslin, R., Nguyen, T.D. and Nguyen, M.L. Meaning of touch: The case of touch from a stranger or same sex person. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 7, 3 (1983), 147--157.
 
13
Hutchinson, K.L. and Davidson, C.A. Body accessibility re--revisited: The 60s, 70s and 80s. In J.W. Neuliep (Ed.), Replication Research in the Social Sciences (pp. 329--340), Sage, Newbury Park, CA, 1991.
 
14
Jourard, S.M. An exploratory study of body--accessibility. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 5, 3 (1966), 221--231.
 
15
Mayor, B., Schmidlin, A.M. and Williams, L. Gender patterns in social touch: The impact of setting and age. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 4 (1990), 634--643.
16
 
17
18


Collaborative Colleagues:
Antal Haans: colleagues
Christiaan de Nood: colleagues
Wijnand A. IJsselsteijn: colleagues