ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Simulation of random cell displacements in QCA
Full text PdfPdf (465 KB)
Source
ACM Journal on Emerging Technologies in Computing Systems (JETC) archive
Volume 3 ,  Issue 1  (April 2007) table of contents
Article No. 2  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISSN:1550-4832
Authors
Gabriel Schulhof  University of Calgary, Canada
Konrad Walus  University of British Columbia
Graham A. Jullien  University of Calgary
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 6,   Downloads (12 Months): 69,   Citation Count: 2
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1229175.1229177
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We analyze the behavior of quantum-dot cellular automata (QCA) building blocks in the presence of random cell displacements. The QCA cells are modeled using the coherence vector description and simulated using QCADesigner. We evaluate various fundamental circuits: the wire, the inverter, the majority gate, and the two-wire crossing approaches: the coplanar crossover and the multilayer crossover. Our results show that different building blocks have different displacement tolerances. The coplanar crossover and inverter perform the weakest. The wire is the most robust. We have found displacement tolerances to be a function of circuit layout and geometry rather than cell size.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Blair, E. P. 2003. Tools for the design and simulation of clocked molecular quantum-dot cellular automata circuits. Tech. rep., University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN.
 
2
Gin, A., Tougaw, P. D., and Williams, S. 1999. An alternative geometry for quantum-dot cellular automata. J. Appl. Phys. 85, 12 (June), 8281--8286.
 
3
 
4
 
5
Imre, A., Csaba, G., Ji, L., Orlov, A., Bernstein, G. H., and Porod, W. 2006. Majority logic gate for magnetic quantum-dot cellular automata. Science 311, 5758, 205--208.
 
6
Jiao, J., Long, G. J., Grandjean, F., Beatty, A. M., and Fehlner, T. P. 2003. Building blocks for the molecular expression of quantum cellular automata. isolation and characterization of a covalently bonded square array of two ferrocenium and two ferrocene complexes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125, 25, 7522--7523.
 
7
Lent, C. S. 1993. Quantum cellular automata. Nanotechnology 4, 49--57.
 
8
Lent, C. S. and Isaksen, B. 2003. Clocked molecular quantum-dot cellular automata. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 50, 9, 1890--1896.
 
9
Lent, C. S., Isaksen, B., and Lieberman, M. 2003. Molecular quantum-dot cellular automata. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125, 1056--1063.
 
10
Lent, C. S. and Tougaw, P. D. 1997. A device architecture for computing with quantum dots. Proceedings of IEEE 85, 4 (April), 541--557.
 
11
Lu, Y. and Lent, C. S. 2005. Theoretical study of molecular quantum-dot cellular automata. J. Comput. Elec. 4, 115--118.
 
12
Macucci, M., Gattobigio, M., Bonci, L., Iannaccone, G., Prins, F. E., Single, C., Wetekam, G., and Kern, D. P. 2004. A QCA cell in silicon-on-insulator technology: theory and experiment. Superlatt. Microstruct. 34, 3 (Sept.), 205--211.
 
13
Mahler, G. and Weberrüs, V. A. 1998. Quantum Networks: Dynamics of Open Nanostructures. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
 
14
Orlov, A. O., Kummamuru, R. K., Ramasubramaniam, R., Lent, C. S., Berstein, G. H., and Snider, G. L. 2003. Clocked quantum-dot cellular automata shift register. Surf. Sci. 532--535, 1193--1198.
 
15
Tahoori, M. B., Huang, J., Momenzadeh, M., and Lombardi, F. 2004. Testing of quantum cellular automata. IEEE Trans. Nano. 3, 4 (Dec.), 432--442.
 
16
 
17
Timler, J. and Lent, C. S. 2002. Power gain and dissipation in quantum-dot cellular automata. J. Appl. Phys. 91, 2 (Jan.), 823--831.
 
18
Timler, J. and Lent, C. S. 2003. Maxwell's demon and quantum-dot cellular automata. J. Appl. Phys. 94, 2 (July), 1050--1060.
 
19
Tóth, G. 2000. Correlation and coherence in quantum-dot cellular automata. Ph.D. thesis, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556.
 
20
Tougaw, P. D. and Lent, C. S. 1996. Dynamic behavior of quantum cellular automata. J. Appl. Phys. 80, 8 (Oct.), 4722--4735.
 
21
Walus, K. and Jullien, G. A. 2006. Design tools for an emerging soc technology: quantum-dot cellular automata. Proceedings of IEEE 94, 6 (June), 1225--1244.
 
22
 
23
Walus, K. and Schulhof, G. 2001. QCADesigner Homepage. http://www.qcadesigner.ca/.
 
24
Walus, K., Schulhof, G., and Jullien, G. A. 2004. High level exploration of quantum-dot cellular automata (QCA). In Proceedings of IEEE Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems, and Computers.
 
25
Walus, K., Schulhof, G., Zhang, R., Wang, W., and Jullien, G. A. 2004. Circuit design based on majority gates for applications with quantum-dot cellular automata. In Proceedings of IEEE Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems, and Computers.
 
26
Wang, W., Walus, K., and Jullien, G. A. 2003. Quantum-dot cellular automata adders. In Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Nanotechnology.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Gabriel Schulhof: colleagues
Konrad Walus: colleagues
Graham A. Jullien: colleagues