ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Threads™: how to restructure a computer science curriculum for a flat world
Full text PdfPdf (173 KB)
Source Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education archive
Proceedings of the 38th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education table of contents
Covington, Kentucky, USA
SESSION: Curriculum issues table of contents
Pages: 420 - 424  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISBN:1-59593-361-1
Also published in ...
Authors
Merrick Furst  Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia
Charles Isbell  Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia
Mark Guzdial  Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia
Sponsors
SIGCSE: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Science Education
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 7,   Downloads (12 Months): 75,   Citation Count: 5
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1227310.1227456
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In his book The World is Flat, Thomas Friedman convincingly explains the challenges of a global marketplace [4]. One implication is that software development can be out-sourced, as can any narrow, skills-based occupation; however, as Friedman also points out, leadership, innovation, and insight are always in demand. We have recently created and are implementing threadstm, a new structuring principle for computing curricula. Threads provides one clear path for computer scientists seeking to reinvent and re-invigorate computer science degree programs. Threads form a cohesive, coordinated set of contexts for understanding computing. The union of all threads covers the breadth "computer science." The union of any two threads is sufficient to cover a computer science degree. In this paper, we describe Threads, our process, the impact so far, and some of our future plans. We close with recommendations for other schools, especially schools with smaller programs.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
P. C. Blumenfeld, E. Soloway, R. W. Marx, J. S. Krajcik, M. Guzdial, and A. Palincsar. Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist, 26(3 & 4):369--398, 1991.
 
2
J. Donald. Improving the Environment for Learning: Academic Leaders Talk About What Works. Jossey-Bass, 1997.
 
3
M. S. Donovan, J. D. Bransford, and J. W. Pellegrino. How People Learn: Bridging Research and Practice. National Academy Press, Washington DC, 1999.
 
4
 
5
M. Furst and R. A. DeMillo. Creating symphonic-thinking computer science graduates for an increasingly competitive global environment. http://www.cc.gatech.edu/images/pdfs/threads_whitepaper.pdf, 2006.
6
 
7
 
8
E. Montalbano. Gates worried over decline in us computer scientists. Computer World, July 18 2005.
 
9
D. H. Pink. A Whole New Mind: Moving from the Information Age to the Conceptual Age. Riverhead Hardcover, 2005.
 
10
P. R. Pintrich and D. H. Schunk. Motivation in Education: Theory, Research, and Applications. Prentice-Hall, 1996.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Merrick Furst: colleagues
Charles Isbell: colleagues
Mark Guzdial: colleagues