| A taxonomy of tasks for guiding the evaluation of multidimensional visualizations |
| Full text |
Pdf
(90 KB)
|
| Source
|
AVI
archive
Proceedings of the 2006 AVI workshop on BEyond time and errors: novel evaluation methods for information visualization
table of contents
Venice, Italy
SESSION: Developing benchmarks datasets and tasks
table of contents
Pages: 1 - 6
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:1-59593-562-2
|
|
Authors
|
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 11, Downloads (12 Months): 132, Citation Count: 1
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
The design of multidimensional visualization techniques is based on the assumption that a graphical representation of a large dataset can give more insight to a user, by providing him/her a more intuitive support in the process of exploiting data. When developing a visualization technique, the analytic and exploratory tasks that a user might need or want to perform on the data should guide the choice of the visual and interaction metaphors implemented by the technique. Usability testing of visualization techniques also needs the definition of users' tasks. The identification and understanding of the nature of the users' tasks in the process of acquiring knowledge from visual representations of data is a recent branch in information visualization research. Some works have proposed taxonomies to organize tasks that a visualization technique should support. This paper proposes a taxonomy of visualization tasks, based on existing taxonomies as well as on the observation of users performing exploratory tasks in a multidimensional data set using two different visualization techniques, Parallel Coordinates and RadViz. Different scenarios involving low-level tasks were estimated for the completion of some high-level tasks, and they were compared to the scenarios observed during the users' experiments.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
|
| |
2
|
|
 |
3
|
|
| |
4
|
Inselberg, A., The Plane with Parallel Coordinates, Special Issue on Computational Geometry, The Visual Computer, 1, (1995), 69--91.
|
| |
5
|
Patrick Hoffman , Georges Grinstein , Kenneth Marx , Ivo Grosse , Eugene Stanley, DNA visual and analytic data mining, Proceedings of the 8th conference on Visualization '97, p.437-ff., October 18-24, 1997, Phoenix, Arizona, United States
|
| |
6
|
|
| |
7
|
|
| |
8
|
|
| |
9
|
|
| |
10
|
|
 |
11
|
|
| |
12
|
Ignatius, E., Senay, H. and Favre J., An intelligent system for task-specific visualization assistance, Journal of Visual Language and Computing, 5, (1994), 321--338.
|
 |
13
|
Michael D. Byrne , Bonnie E. John , Neil S. Wehrle , David C. Crow, The tangled Web we wove: a taskonomy of WWW use, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: the CHI is the limit, p.544-551, May 15-20, 1999, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
[doi> 10.1145/302979.303154]
|
| |
14
|
|
| |
15
|
|
| |
16
|
Norman, D., Cognitive Engineering, User Centred System Design: New Perspectives on Human-Computer Interaction, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, (1986), 31--61.
|
| |
17
|
|
 |
18
|
|
 |
19
|
|
| |
20
|
|
| |
21
|
|
| |
22
|
|
|