ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Temporalised normative positions in defeasible logic
Full text PdfPdf (532 KB)
Source International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law archive
Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law table of contents
Bologna, Italy
SESSION: Logical formalizations table of contents
Pages: 25 - 34  
Year of Publication: 2005
ISBN:1-59593-081-7
Authors
Guido Governatori  University of Queensland, Australia
Antonino Rotolo  University of Bologna, Italy
Giovanni Sartor  University of Bologna, Italy
Sponsors
: The International Association for Artificial Intelligence and Law
: CIRSFID
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 2,   Downloads (12 Months): 21,   Citation Count: 8
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1165485.1165490
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We propose a computationally oriented non-monotonic multi-modal logic arising from the combination of temporalised agency and temporalised normative positions. We argue about the defeasible nature of these notions and then we show how to represent and reason with them in the setting of Defeasible Logic.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
G. Antoniou, D. Billington, G. Governatori, M. Maher, and A. Rock. A family of defeasible reasoning logics and its implementation. In W. Horn, editor, Proc. ECAI 2000, Amsterdam, 2000. IOS.
3
 
4
N. Bassiliades, G. Antoniou, and I. Vlahavas. DR-DEVICE: A defeasible logic system for the Semantic Web. In H. J. Ohlbach and S. Schaffert, editors, 2nd Workshop on Principles and Practice of Semantic Web Reasoning. Springer, 2004.
 
5
 
6
D. Elgesem. The modal logic of agency. Nordic Journal of Philosophical Logic, 2:1--48, 1997.
 
7
 
8
G. Governatori. Representing business contracts in RuleML. Int. Journal of Coop. Inf. Syst., 14(2-3), 2005.
 
9
 
10
G. Governatori and A. Rotolo. Defeasible logic: Agency, intention and obligation. In A. Lomuscio and D. Nute, editors, Proc. DEON 2004, Berlin, 2004. Springer.
 
11
G. Governatori and A. Rotolo. Modelling contracts in RuleML. In T. Gordon, editor, Proc. Jurix 2004, Amsterdam, 2004. IOS.
 
12
 
13
A. J. I. Jones and M. Sergot. A formal characterisation of institutionalised power. Journal of IGPL, 3:427--443, 1996.
 
14
Ch. Krogh and H. Herrestad. Getting personal: Some notes on the relationship between personal and impersonal obligation. In M. Brown and J. Carmo, editors, Proc. DEON 1996, Berlin, 1996. Springer.
 
15
A. Lomuscio and D. Nute, editors. Proc. DEON 2004, Berlin, 2004. Springer.
 
16
 
17
M. J. Maher, A. Rock, G. Antoniou, D. Billignton, and T. Miller. Efficient defeasible reasoning systems. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence Tools, 10(4):483--501, 2001.
 
18
D. Nute. Defeasible logic. In Handbook of Logic in Artificial Intelligence and Logic Programming, volume 3. OUP, 1987.
 
19
D. Nute. Norms, priorities, and defeasible logic. In P. McNamara and H. Prakken, editors, Proc. DEON 1998. IOS, Amsterdam, 1998.
 
20
 
21
H. Prakken and G. Sartor. A dialectical model of assessing conflicting arguments in legal reasoning. Al and Law, 4:331--368, 1996.
 
22
 
23
G. Sartor. Legal Reasoning. Springer, Dordrecht, 2005.
 
24
J. R. Searle. The Construction of Social Reality. Penguin, Harmondsworth, 1995.
 
25

CITED BY  8
 
 
 
 
 
 
Collaborative Colleagues:
Guido Governatori: colleagues
Antonino Rotolo: colleagues
Giovanni Sartor: colleagues