| Analysis methodology: are we done? |
| Full text |
Pdf
(190 KB)
|
| Source
|
Winter Simulation Conference
archive
Proceedings of the 37th conference on Winter simulation
table of contents
Orlando, Florida
PANEL SESSION: Analysis methodology A: analysis methodlogy reflection
table of contents
Pages: 790 - 796
Year of Publication: 2005
ISBN:0-7803-9519-0
|
|
Authors
|
|
Sigrün Andradóttir
|
Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA
|
|
David Goldsman
|
Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA
|
|
Lee W. Schruben
|
University of California, Berkeley, CA
|
|
Bruce W. Schmeiser
|
Purdue University, W. Lafayette, IN
|
|
Enver Yücesan
|
INSEAD, Fontainebleau Cedex, France
|
|
| Publisher |
Winter Simulation Conference
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 2, Downloads (12 Months): 18, Citation Count: 1
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
Since 1967, the Winter Simulation Conference has been a forum for the introduction of innovative approaches to effectively analyze discrete-event simulation experiments. The goal of this panel is to bring together key contributors to analysis methodology research in order to clarify areas that they think are essentially complete, and identify areas that need more work. In doing so, we hope to help provide direction to younger researchers looking for the "right" problems to work on.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
Russell R. Barton , Stephen E. Chick , Russell C. H. Cheng , Shane G. Henderson , Averill M. Law , Bruce W. Schmeiser , Lawrence M. Leemis , Lee W. Schruben , James R. Wilson, Panel discussion on current issues in input modeling: panel on current issues in simulation input modeling, Proceedings of the 34th conference on Winter simulation: exploring new frontiers, December 08-11, 2002, San Diego, California
|
| |
2
|
|
| |
3
|
Cario, M. C. and B. L. Nelson. 1997. Modeling and generating random vectors with arbitrary marginal distributions and correlation matrix. Technical Report, Department of Industrial Engineering and Management Sciences, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois.
|
| |
4
|
Conway, R. 1963. Some tactical problems in digital simulation. Management Science, 10: 47--61.
|
| |
5
|
Halim Damerdji , Shane G. Henderson , Peter W. Glynn, Computational efficiency evaluation in output analysis, Proceedings of the 29th conference on Winter simulation, p.208-215, December 07-10, 1997, Atlanta, Georgia, United States
[doi> 10.1145/268437.268481]
|
| |
6
|
Fishman, G. S. and L. S. Yarberry. 1997. An implementation of the batch means method. INFORMS Journal on Computing, 9(3): 296--310.
|
| |
7
|
|
| |
8
|
Glasserman, P. 2004. Monte Carlo Methods in Financial Engineering, Springer. New York.
|
| |
9
|
Govind, N. 2004. Robust parameter design with imperfect experimental control of noise. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University.
|
| |
10
|
|
 |
11
|
|
| |
12
|
|
| |
13
|
|
| |
14
|
|
| |
15
|
Melamed, B. 1991. TES: a class of methods for generating autocorrelated uniform variates. ORSA Journal on Computing, 3:317--329.
|
 |
16
|
|
 |
17
|
Natalie M. Steiger , Emily K. Lada , James R. Wilson , Jeffrey A. Joines , Christos Alexopoulos , David Goldsman, ASAP3: a batch means procedure for steady-state simulation analysis, ACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation (TOMACS), v.15 n.1, p.39-73, January 2005
[doi> 10.1145/1044322.1044325]
|
| |
18
|
Wagner, M. A. F. and J. R. Wilson. 1996. Using univariate Bezier distributions to model simulation input processes. IIE Transactions, 28 (9): 699--712.
|
| |
19
|
Yarris, L., Computing resources available to Lab researchers, Berkeley Lab Currents, Lawrence Berkeley Labs, July 12, 1996.
|
|