ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Exposing digital forgeries through chromatic aberration
Full text PdfPdf (1.52 MB)
Source International Multimedia Conference archive
Proceedings of the 8th workshop on Multimedia and security table of contents
Geneva, Switzerland
SESSION: Authentication and forensics table of contents
Pages: 48 - 55  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:1-59593-493-6
Authors
Micah K. Johnson  Dartmouth College
Hany Farid  Dartmouth College
Sponsors
SIGMULTIMEDIA: ACM Special Interest Group on Multimedia
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 10,   Downloads (12 Months): 98,   Citation Count: 3
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1161366.1161376
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Virtually all optical imaging systems introduce a variety of aberrations into an image. Chromatic aberration, for example, results from the failure of an optical system to perfectly focus light of different wavelengths. Lateral chromatic aberration manifests itself, to a first-order approximation, as an expansion/contraction of color channels with respect to one another. When tampering with an image, this aberration is often disturbed and fails to be consistent across the image. We describe a computational technique for automatically estimating lateral chromatic aberration and show its efficacy in detecting digital tampering.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
T.E. Boult and G. Wolberg. Correcting chromatic aberrations using image warping. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 684--687, 1992.
 
2
H. Farid and E. Simoncelli. Differentiation of multi-dimensional signals. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 13(4):496--508, 2004.
 
3
J. Fridrich, D. Soukal, and J. Lukáš. Detection of copy-move forgery in digital images. In Proceedings of DFRWS, 2003.
 
4
E. Hecht. Optics. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc., 4th edition, 2002.
5
 
6
J. Lukáš, J. Fridrich, and M. Goljan. Detecting digital image forgeries using sensor pattern noise. In Proceedings of the SPIE, volume 6072, 2006.
 
7
T. Ng and S. Chang. A model for image splicing. In IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, Singapore, 2004.
 
8
A.C. Popescuand, H. Farid. Exposing digital forgeries by detecting duplicated image regions. Technical Report TR2004- 15, Department of Computer Science, Dartmouth College, 2004.
 
9
A.C. Popescuand, H. Farid. Exposing digital forgeries by detecting traces of resampling. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 53(2):758--767, 2005.
 
10
A.C. Popescu and H. Farid. Exposing digital forgeries in color filter array interpolated images. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 53(10):3948--3959, 2005.
 
11
 
12
R.G. Willson and S.A. Shafer. What is the center of the image? Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 11(11):2946--2955, November 1994.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Micah K. Johnson: colleagues
Hany Farid: colleagues