| Towards security labelling |
| Full text |
Pdf
(202 KB)
|
| Source
|
ACM International Conference Proceeding Series; Vol. 171
archive
Proceedings of the 29th Australasian Computer Science Conference - Volume 48
table of contents
Hobart, Australia
Pages: 69 - 76
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN ~ ISSN:1445-1336 , 1-920682-30-9
|
|
Authors
|
|
Chuchang Liu
|
Information Networks Division, Defence Science and Technology Organisation, Edinburgh, SA, Australia
|
|
Mehmet A. Orgun
|
Department of Computing, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
|
|
| Publisher |
Australian Computer Society, Inc.
Darlinghurst, Australia, Australia
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 1, Downloads (12 Months): 11, Citation Count: 1
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
Security labels are applied for numerous reasons, including the handling of data communicated between open systems. The information contained within a security label can be utilised to perform access control decisions, specify protective measure, and aid in the determination of additional handling restrictions required by a communications security policy. This paper concerns the issues regarding security labelling in open systems. We propose a security labelling framework for such systems; and further, based on this framework, we develop a mechanically checkable model for security labelling systems and discuss its implementation issues. This model provides a functional base for future design and implementation of security labelling systems.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
FIPS PUB 188. (1994), Standard Security Label for Information Transfer. Available from www.itl.nist.gov/fipspubs/fipl88.htm.
|
| |
2
|
ISO/IEC 7498-1 (1994), Information Technology - Open Systems Interconnection - Basic Reference Model: The Basic Model. ISO (the International Organization for Standardization) and IEC (the International Electrotechnical Commission).
|
| |
3
|
AusCert, Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu. (2002), Australian Computer Crime and Security Survey. http://www.auscert.org.au/Information/ Auscert_info/2002cs.pdf.
|
| |
4
|
Bell, D. E. & LaPadula, L. J. (1976), Secure Computer System: Unified exposition and Multics interpretation. MTR-2997, MITRE, Bedford, MA.
|
| |
5
|
Biba, K. J. (1977), Integrity Consideration for Secure Computer Systems. MTR-3153, The Mitre Corporation.
|
| |
6
|
Internet CIPSO Working Group. (1993), Common IP Security Option Version 2.3. Internet Draft.
|
 |
7
|
|
| |
8
|
Housley, R. (1993), Security Labeling Framework for the Intenet. Internet RFC 1457, May 1993.
|
| |
9
|
ITU-T Recommendation X.841 (2000), Information technology - Security Techniques - Security information objects for access control.
|
| |
10
|
McCabe, K., Rassenti, S. & Smith, V. (1996), Game theory and reciprocity in some extensive form experimental games. Proceeding of The National Academy of Science, 93:13421-13428.
|
 |
11
|
|
| |
12
|
|
| |
13
|
|
| |
14
|
|
 |
15
|
Steve Zdancewic , Lantian Zheng , Nathaniel Nystrom , Andrew C. Myers, Untrusted hosts and confidentiality: secure program partitioning, Proceedings of the eighteenth ACM symposium on Operating systems principles, October 21-24, 2001, Banff, Alberta, Canada
|
| |
16
|
Zheng, L. & Myers, A.C. (2004), Dynamic security labels and noninterference. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Formal Aspects in Security and Trust (FAST), Toulouse, France.
|
CITED BY
|
|
Chuchang Liu , Angela Billard , Maris Ozols , Nikifor Jeremic, Access control models and security labelling, Proceedings of the thirtieth Australasian conference on Computer science, p.181-190, January 30-February 02, 2007, Ballarat, Victoria, Australia
|
|