ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Towards security labelling
Full text PdfPdf (202 KB)
Source ACM International Conference Proceeding Series; Vol. 171 archive
Proceedings of the 29th Australasian Computer Science Conference - Volume 48 table of contents
Hobart, Australia
Pages: 69 - 76  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN ~ ISSN:1445-1336 , 1-920682-30-9
Authors
Chuchang Liu  Information Networks Division, Defence Science and Technology Organisation, Edinburgh, SA, Australia
Mehmet A. Orgun  Department of Computing, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
Publisher
Australian Computer Society, Inc.  Darlinghurst, Australia, Australia
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 1,   Downloads (12 Months): 11,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  

ABSTRACT

Security labels are applied for numerous reasons, including the handling of data communicated between open systems. The information contained within a security label can be utilised to perform access control decisions, specify protective measure, and aid in the determination of additional handling restrictions required by a communications security policy. This paper concerns the issues regarding security labelling in open systems. We propose a security labelling framework for such systems; and further, based on this framework, we develop a mechanically checkable model for security labelling systems and discuss its implementation issues. This model provides a functional base for future design and implementation of security labelling systems.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
FIPS PUB 188. (1994), Standard Security Label for Information Transfer. Available from www.itl.nist.gov/fipspubs/fipl88.htm.
 
2
ISO/IEC 7498-1 (1994), Information Technology - Open Systems Interconnection - Basic Reference Model: The Basic Model. ISO (the International Organization for Standardization) and IEC (the International Electrotechnical Commission).
 
3
AusCert, Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu. (2002), Australian Computer Crime and Security Survey. http://www.auscert.org.au/Information/ Auscert_info/2002cs.pdf.
 
4
Bell, D. E. & LaPadula, L. J. (1976), Secure Computer System: Unified exposition and Multics interpretation. MTR-2997, MITRE, Bedford, MA.
 
5
Biba, K. J. (1977), Integrity Consideration for Secure Computer Systems. MTR-3153, The Mitre Corporation.
 
6
Internet CIPSO Working Group. (1993), Common IP Security Option Version 2.3. Internet Draft.
7
 
8
Housley, R. (1993), Security Labeling Framework for the Intenet. Internet RFC 1457, May 1993.
 
9
ITU-T Recommendation X.841 (2000), Information technology - Security Techniques - Security information objects for access control.
 
10
McCabe, K., Rassenti, S. & Smith, V. (1996), Game theory and reciprocity in some extensive form experimental games. Proceeding of The National Academy of Science, 93:13421-13428.
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
15
 
16
Zheng, L. & Myers, A.C. (2004), Dynamic security labels and noninterference. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Formal Aspects in Security and Trust (FAST), Toulouse, France.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Chuchang Liu: colleagues
Mehmet A. Orgun: colleagues