ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
An approach to detection ontology changes
Full text PdfPdf (368 KB)
Source International Conference On Web Engineering; Vol. 155 archive
Workshop proceedings of the sixth international conference on Web engineering table of contents
Palo Alto, California
WORKSHOP SESSION: First international workshop on adaptation and evolution in web systems engineering (AEWSE'06) table of contents
Article No. 14  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:1-59593-435-9
Authors
Michal Tury  Slovak University of Technology, Bratislava, Slovakia
Mária Bieliková  Slovak University of Technology, Bratislava, Slovakia
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 6,   Downloads (12 Months): 56,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1149993.1150009
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Ontologies change and evolve both on the level of schema and individuals in order to meet requirements of changing world. Changes involve adding, deleting and modifying elements in the ontology both on structural (schema related) and content (individuals related) levels. The changes can lead to incorrect conclusions and can cause malfunction of systems, which use ontology data. In this paper we describe a proposal of the method for automated detection of currentness of presented data, including meta-data, which are represented by an ontology. Method comes out from a detection of changes between different versions of the ontology. Besides identifying modifications in the ontology, the purpose of the method lies also in identifying equivalent elements, thanks to which we are able to track information sources over time. We describe possibilities of automated identification of changes between ontologies using heuristic methods and their realization as a software tool called OntoDiff for comparing ontologies.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
M. Ciglan, M. Babik, M. Laclavik, I. Budinska, and L. Hluchy. Corporate memory: A framework for supporting tools for acquisition, organization and maintenance of information and knowledge. In J. Zendulka, editor, Proc. of 9th Int. Conf. on Information Systems Implementation and Modelling (ISIM 2006), pages 185--192. MARQ, Ostrava, 2006.
 
2
M. Ehrig, P. Haase, M. Hefke, and N. Stojanovic. Similarity for ontologies - a comprehensive framework. In Proc. of 13th European Conf. on Inf. Systems, 2005.
 
3
 
4
P. Haase and Y. Sure. State of the art on ontology evolution, 2004. Available at www.aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de/WBS/ysu/publications/SEKT-D3.1.1.b.pdf.
 
5
J. Hunt and M. McIlroy. An algorithm for differential file comparison. Bell Telephone Labs CSTR #41, 1976. Available at www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~doug/diff.ps.
 
6
 
7
 
8
N. Noy, S. Kunnatur, M. Klein, and M. Musen. Tracking changes during ontology evolution. In Proc. of Int. Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2004), pages 259--273, 2004.
 
9
 
10
OCLC - Online Computer Library Center. Web characterization. Available at http://wcp.oclc.org.
 
11
P. Plessers and O. D. Troyer. Ontology change detection using a version log. In ISWC 2005, pages 578--592. Springer, LNCS 3729, 2005.
 
12
M. Tury. Identification and management of onology changes. Master's thesis, Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava, 2005.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Michal Tury: colleagues
Mária Bieliková: colleagues