ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
A comparison of perceived and real shoulder-surfing risks between alphanumeric and graphical passwords
Full text PdfPdf (132 KB)
Source SOUPS; Vol. 149 archive
Proceedings of the second symposium on Usable privacy and security table of contents
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
SESSION: Password management, mnemonics, and mother's maiden names table of contents
Pages: 56 - 66  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:1-59593-448-0
Authors
Furkan Tari  UMBC, Baltimore, MD
A. Ant Ozok  UMBC, Baltimore, MD
Stephen H. Holden  UMBC, Baltimore, MD
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 19,   Downloads (12 Months): 206,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1143120.1143128
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Previous research has found graphical passwords to be more memorable than non-dictionary or "strong" alphanumeric passwords. Participants in a prior study expressed concerns that this increase in memorability could also lead to an increased susceptibility of graphical passwords to shoulder-surfing. This appears to be yet another example of the classic trade-off between usability and security for authentication systems. This paper explores whether graphical passwords' increased memorability necessarily leads to risks of shoulder-surfing. To date, there are no studies examining the vulnerability of graphical versus alphanumeric passwords to shoulder-surfing.This paper examines the real and perceived vulnerability to shoulder-surfing of two configurations of a graphical password, Passfaces™[30], compared to non-dictionary and dictionary passwords. A laboratory experiment with 20 participants asked them to try to shoulder surf the two configurations of Passfaces™ (mouse versus keyboard data entry) and strong and weak passwords. Data gathered included the vulnerability of the four authentication system configurations to shoulder-surfing and study participants' perceptions concerning the same vulnerability. An analysis of these data compared the relative vulnerability of each of the four configurations to shoulder-surfing and also compared study participants' real and perceived success in shoulder-surfing each of the configurations. Further analysis examined the relationship between study participants' real and perceived success in shoulder-surfing and determined whether there were significant differences in the vulnerability of the four authentication configurations to shoulder-surfing.Findings indicate that configuring data entry for Passfaces™ through a keyboard is the most effective deterrent to shoulder-surfing in a laboratory setting and the participants' perceptions were consistent with that result. While study participants believed that Passfaces™ with mouse data entry would be most vulnerable to shoulder-surfing attacks, the empirical results found that strong passwords were actually more vulnerable.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
2
 
3
C. T. Beardsley, "Is Your Computer Insecure?," IEEE Spectrum, vol. 9, pp. 67--78, 1972.
 
4
V. A. Brennen, "Cryptography Dictionary," vol. 2005. 1.0.0 ed. 2004.
 
5
S. Brostoff and A. Sasse, "Are Passfaces More Usable Than Passwords? A Field Trial Investigation," presented at People and Computers XIV - Usability or Else! Proceedings of HCI 2000, Sunderland University, 2000.
 
6
R. Chellappa. C. L. Wilson, and S. Sirohey, "Human and Machine Recognition of Faces: A Survey," Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 83, pp. 705--741, 1995.
 
7
 
8
 
9
D. Davis, F. Monrose, and M. Reiter, "On User Choice in Graphical Password Schemes," presented at 13th Usenix Security Symposium, San Diego, CA, 2004.
 
10
A. De Angeli, M. Coutts, L. Coventry, D. Cameron, G. I. Johnson, and M. Fischer, "VIP: A Visual Approach to User Authentication," presented at Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces: AVI2002, Trento, Italy, 2002.
 
11
Department of Defense Computer Security Center, "Department of Defense Password Management Guideline," Department of Defense, Washington, DC CSC-STD-002-85, April 12 1985.
 
12
R. Dhamija and A. Perrig, "Deja Vu: A User Study. Using Images for Authentication," presented at 9th USENIX Security Symposium, 2000.
 
13
P. Doyle and S. Hanna, "Analysis of June 2003 Survey on Obstacles to PKI Deployment and Usage," Organization for the Advancement of Structured Information Standards, Billerica, MA August 8 2003.
 
14
S. M. Furnell, I. Papadopoulos, and P. S. Dowland, "A long-term trial of alternative user authentication technologies," Information Management and Computer Security, vol. 12, pp. 178--190, 2004.
 
15
S. Granger, "Social Engineering Fundamentals, Part I: Hacker Tactics," vol. 2006: SecurityFocus, 2001.
16
 
17
I. Jermyn, A. Mayer, F. Monrose, M. Reiter, and A. Rubin, "The Design and Analysis of Graphical Passwords," presented at 8th USENIX Security Symposium, Washington, DC, 1999.
 
18
J. Liddell, K. Renaud, and A. De Angeli, "Using a Combination of Sound and Images to Authenticate Web Users," presented at 17th Annual Human Computer Interaction Conference: Designing for Society, Bath England, 2003.
 
19
S. Man, D. Hong, B. Hayes, and M. Matthews, "A password scheme strongly resistant to spyware," presented at Int. Conf. on Security and Management, Las Vegas, NV, 2004.
 
20
S. Man, D. Hong, M. Matthews, and J. C. Birget, "A shoulder-surfing resistant graphical password scheme," 2006.
 
21
G. A. Miller, "The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two: Some Limits on Our Capacity for Processing Information," The Psychological Review, vol. 63, pp. 81--97, 1956.
 
22
 
23
National Research Council, Who Goes There? Authentication Through the Lens of Privacy. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2003.
24
 
25
L. O'Gorman, "Comparing Passwords, Tokens, and Biometrics for User Authentication," Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 91, pp. 2021--2039, 2003.
26
 
27
A. A. Ozok and S. H. Holden. "Alphanumeric and Graphical Authentication Solutions: A Comparative Evaluation," presented at HCI International 2005, Las Vegas, NV, 2005.
28
 
29
R. W. Proctor, M.-C. Lien, K.-P. L. Vu, and G. Salvendy, "Improving Computer Security for Authentication of Users: Influence of Proactive Password Restrictions," Behavior Reearch Methods, Instruments & Computers, vol. 34, pp. 163--169, 2002.
 
30
Real User Corporation, "How the Passface#8482; System Works," vol. 2005, 2005.
 
31
K. Renaud and E. Smith, "Helping Users to Remember Their Passwords," presented at Annual Conference of the South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists, Pretoria, South Africa, 2001.
 
32
K. Renaud and A. D. Angeli, "My Password is here! An investigation into visio-spatial authentication mechanisms," Interacting with Computers, vol. 16, pp. 1017--1041, 2004.
33
 
34
 
35
L. Sobrado and J. C. Birget, "Shoulder-surfing resistant graphical passwords," Draft.
 
36
 
37
 
38
M. Turk, "A Random Walk Through Eigenspace," IEICE Transactions of Information and Systems, vol. E84-D, pp. 1586--1595, 2001.
 
39
J. J. Turnage, "The Challenge of New Workplace Technology for Psychology," American Psychologist, vol. 45, pp. 171--178, 1990.
 
40
41
 
42
A. Whitten and J. D. Tygar, "Why Johnny Can't Encrypt: A Usability Evaluation of PGP 5.0," presented at 8th Usenix Security Symposium, Washington, DC, 1999.
 
43
 
44
R. J. Witty and K. Brittain, "Automated Password Reset Can Cut IT Service Desk Costs," Gartner, Inc., Stamford, CT G00123531, December 13 2004.
 
45
R. J. Witty, "Bank of America Implements Simplified Single Sign-On," Gartner, Inc., Stamford, CT G00123465, January 25 2005.
 
46


Collaborative Colleagues:
Furkan Tari: colleagues
A. Ant Ozok: colleagues
Stephen H. Holden: colleagues