ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
From vertical to horizontal architecture: a cross-layer implementation in a sensor network node
Full text PdfPdf (169 KB)
Source InterSense; Vol. 138 archive
Proceedings of the first international conference on Integrated internet ad hoc and sensor networks table of contents
Nice, France
SESSION: Node implementation and integration into internet table of contents
Article No. 6  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:1-59593-427-8
Authors
Ismo Hakala  University of Jyväskylä
Merja Tikkakoski  University of Jyväskylä
Sponsors
: EU (IST-FET)
: Create-Net
: ICST
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 10,   Downloads (12 Months): 69,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1142680.1142688
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Some of the main challenges related to wireless sensor networks implementation are low-quality communication, energy conservation, resource-constrained computation, distributed network management, data processing and the scalability of the protocols. This combination makes the implementation of software a demanding task and encourages to new approaches when thinking of software architecture.In this paper an architecture combining a low protocol stack with a cross-layer management entity is presented. One of the main ideas behind the architecture presented is to make application programming easier and to simplify the protocol stack in such a way that it would suit better for the limited resources available. The role of the cross-layer management entity is to offer a shared data structure and to take care of some sensor network specific functions, like topology management and power saving. It also provides certain services that applications and the layers in the protocol stack can use.This architecture has been created specially for needs of wireless sensor networks implementation and the special attention has been paid to modularity and testability of implementation. An implementation based on this cross-layer architecture, CiNet, is also presented in this paper. The functionality of the architecture and the CiNet network was verified by using two different protocol stacks. Wireless communication of the network is based on the 802.15.4 technology.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
M. Conti, G. Maselli, G. Turi, and S. Giordano, "Cross-Layering in Mobile Ad Hoc Network Design," IEEE Computer, special issue on Ad Hoc Networks, February 2004.
 
2
A. Dunkels, T. Voigt, J. Alonso, "Making TCP/IP Viable for Wireless Sensor Networks," in: Proceedings of the First European Workshop on Wireless Sensor Networks (EWSN'04), Berlin, Germany, 2004.
 
3
A. J. Goldsmith, S. B. Wicker, "Design challenges for energy-constrained ad hoc wireless networks," IEEE Wireless Communications Magazine, vol. 9: 4, 2002, 8--27.
 
4
J. Haapola, Z. Shelby, C. Pomalaza-Ráez, P. Mähönen, "Cross-layer energy analysis of multi-hop wireless sensor networks," in: 2nd European Workshop on Wireless Sensor Networks (EWSN), Istanbul, Turkey, 2005.
 
5
L. van Hoesel, T. Nieberg, W. Jian, P. J. M. Havinga, "Prolonging the lifetime of wireless sensor networks by cross-layer interaction," IEEE Wireless Communications, vol. 11: 6, December 2004, 78--86.
 
6
IEEE P802.15.4/D18, Draft Standard for Part 15.4: Wireless Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) specifications for Low Rate Wireless Personal Area Networks(LR-WPANs), February 2003.
 
7
K. B. Johnsson, D. C. Cox, "An adaptive cross-layer scheduler for improved QoS support of mixed data traffic on wireless data systems," in: Vehicular Technology Conference, 6-9 October 2003, 1618 -- 1622.
 
8
D. C. O'Neill, L. Yan, S. Boyd, "MP-DSM: a distributed cross layer network control protocol," in: Communications, IEEE International Conference on Vol. 4, 20-24 June 2004, 2102 -- 2106.
 
9
A. Saaranen, C. A. Pomalaza-Ráez, "Comparison of Reactive Routing and Flooding in Wireless Sensor Networks," in: Proceedings of The Nordic Radio Symposium, Oulu, Finland, 2004.
 
10
A. Safwat, H. Hassanein, H. Mouftah, "Optimal Cross-Layer Designs for Energy-Efficient Wireless Ad hoc and Sensor Networks," in: The 22nd IEEE International Performance, Computing, and Communications Conference (IPCCC 2003), Phoenix, Arizona, USA, April 2003.
 
11
S. Shakkottai, T. S. Rappaport, P. C. Karlsson, "Cross-layer design for wireless networks," IEEE Communications Magazine, Vol. 41:10, October 2003, 74 -- 80.
 
12
Z. Shelby, P. Mähönen, J. Riihijärvi, O. Raivio, P. Huuskonen," NanoIP: The Zen of Embedded Networking," in: ICC 2003, 12-18 May 2003.
 
13
Y. Wu, P. A. Chou, Q. Zhang, K. Jain, W. Zhu, S.-Y. Kung, "Network planning in wireless ad hoc networks: a cross-layer approach," IEEE Journal on Selected Areas on Communications (Special Issue on Wireless Ad hoc Networks), January 2005.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Ismo Hakala: colleagues
Merja Tikkakoski: colleagues