ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
On the relationship between roles and power: preliminary report
Full text PdfPdf (155 KB)
Source Symposium on Applied Computing archive
Proceedings of the 2006 ACM symposium on Applied computing table of contents
Dijon, France
SESSION: Computer-aided law and advanced technologies (CLAT) table of contents
Pages: 313 - 318  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:1-59593-108-2
Author
Maria Fasli  University of Essex, Wivenhoe Park, Colchester, UK
Sponsor
SIGAPP: ACM Special Interest Group on Applied Computing
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 4,   Downloads (12 Months): 30,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1141277.1141351
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This paper discusses a formal analysis of multi-agent systems based on organizational and normative concepts. Social agents (individuals and groups) and multi-agent systems have an underlying structure which is underpinned by roles. Power is legitimized within a social context and it stems from a role. In other words, agents draw their power from the authority positions that they hold in relation to other agents. How roles are intertwined with commitments, obligations, power, rights and authority relations is discussed.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
J. Broersen, M. Dastani, J. Hulstijn, and L. van der Torre. Goal generation in the boid architecture. Cognitive Science Quarterly, 11(3--4):428--447, 2002.
 
2
C. Castelfranchi. Social power: A point missed in multi-agent DAI and HCI. In Decentralized A.I., pages 49--62, 1990.
 
3
C. Castelfranchi. Commitments: From individual intentions to groups and organisations. In Proceedings of the First ICMAS Conference, pages 41--48, 1995.
 
4
 
5
 
6
7
 
8
B. Dunin-Keplicz and R. Verbrugge. Calibrating collective commitments. In Proceedings of the CEEMAS Conference 2003, pages 73--83, 2003.
 
9
 
10
M. Fasli. Heterogeneous BDI agents. Cognitive Systems Research, 4(1):1--22, 2003.
 
11
 
12
 
13
J. French and B. Raven. The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright, editor, Studies in Social Power, pages 150--167. University of Michigan Press, 1959.
 
14
J. Miner. Theories of Organizational Structure and Process. Dreyden Press, 1982.
 
15
J. Pfeffer. Power in Organizations. Pittman, 1981.
 
16
A. Rao and M. Georgeff. Modeling rational agents within a BDI-architecture. In Proceedings of the Second Int. Conf. on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, pages 473--484, 1991.
 
17
A. Rao and M. Georgeff. Decision procedures for BDI logics. Journal of Logic and Computation, 8(3):293--343, 1998.
 
18
 
19
 
20
M. Weber. Economy and Society. University of California Press, 1978.
 
21
 
22
F. Zambonelli, N. Jennings, and M. Wooldridge. Organisational abstractions for the analysis and design of multi-agent systems. In P. Cinacarini and M. Wooldridge, editors, Agent-Oriented Software Engineering, pages 127--141, 2001.
 
23
E. Zambrano. Formal models of authority: Introduction and political economy applications. Rationality and Society, 11:115--138, 1999.