3D contour perception for flow visualization

ABSTRACT

One of the most challenging problems in data visualization is the perception of 3D flow fields because judging the orientation of 3D paths is perceptually difficult. It is hypothesized that perception of the orientations of streamlines in space can greatly benefit from stereoscopic depth cues and motion parallax. In addition, because stereoscopic depth perception is a super-acuity and relies on such factors as small-scale stereoscopic disparity gradient based on texture, stereoscopic depth judgments will be exceptionally sensitive to display quality. In conventional displays, the aliasing of pixels gives completely spurious texture information to the mechanisms of stereoscopic depth perception. We carried out a study to evaluate the importance of 3D cues in perceiving the orientation of curved contours. The result showed that stereo and motion cues are essential to perceiving the orientation of 3D lines. If, however, the contours are rendered as shaded tubes, good orientation information is available even without stereo or motion depth cues.

REFERENCES

• 1: Brian Cabral , Leith Casey Leedom, Imaging vector fields using line integral convolution, Proceedings of the 20th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, p.263-270, September 1993 [doi>10.1145/166117.166151]
• 2: Campbell, F. W. and Green, D. G. 1965. Monocular versus binocular visual acuity. Nature 209: 191--192.
• 3: Frisby, J. P., Buckley, D., and Duke, P. A. 1996. Evidence for recovery of lengths of real objects seen with natural stereo viewing. Perception, 25, 129--154.
• 4: Geiben, M., Rumpf, M. 1993. Visualization of finite elements and tools for numerical analysis. In Advances in Scientific Visualization. F. H. Post and AJS Hin (eds) Springer Verlag.
• 5: Howard, I. P. and Rogers, B. J. 1995. Binocular Vision and Stereopsis. Oxford Psychology Series No 29. Oxford University Press. Oxford.
• 6: J. P. M. Hultquist, Constructing stream surfaces in steady 3D vector fields, Proceedings of the 3rd conference on Visualization '92, October 19-23, 1992, Boston, Massachusetts
• 7: Victoria Interrante , Chester Grosch, Visualizing 3D Flow, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, v.18 n.4, p.49-53, July 1998 [doi>10.1109/38.689664]
• 8: David H. Laidlaw , J. Scott Davidson , Timothy S. Miller , Marco da Silva , R. M. Kirby , William H. Warren , Michael Tarr, Quantitative comparative evaluation of 2D vector field visualization methods, Proceedings of the conference on Visualization '01, October 21-26, 2001, San Diego, California
• 9: Robert S. Laramee , Daniel Weiskopf , Jurgen Schneider , Helwig Hauser, Investigating Swirl and Tumble Flow with a Comparison of Visualization Techniques, Proceedings of the conference on Visualization '04, p.51-58, October 10-15, 2004 [doi>10.1109/VIS.2004.59]
• 10: van Ee, R., and Schor, C. M. 2000. Unconstrained stereoscopic matching of lines. Vision Research, 40, 151--162.
• 11: Norman, J. F. Todd, J. T. Perotti, V. I and Tittle, J. S. 1996. The visual perception of 3-D length. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 22, 173--186.
• 12: C. Rezk-Salama , P. Hastreiter , C. Teitzel , T. Ertl, Interactive exploration of volume line integral convolution based on 3D-texture mapping, Proceedings of the conference on Visualization '99: celebrating ten years, p.233-240, October 1999, San Francisco, California, United States
• 13: Rogers, B. and Cagenello, R. 1989. Disparity curvatures and the perception of three-dimensional surfaces. Nature 339: 137--139.
• 14: Sollenberger, R. L., and Milgram, P. 1993. The effects of stereoscopic and rotational displays in a three dimensional path tracing task. Human Factors, 35(3) 483--500.
• 15: W. J. Schroeder , C. R. Volpe , W. E. Lorensen, The stream polygon: a technique for 3D vector field visualization, Proceedings of the 2nd conference on Visualization '91, October 22-25, 1991, San Diego, California
• 16: Tyler, C. 1975. Spatial organization of binocular disparity sensitivity. Vision Research 15, 583--590.
• 17: Uumori, K. and Nishida, S. 1994. The dynamics of the visual system in combining conflicting KDE and binocular stereopsis cues. Perception and Psychophysics, 55(5), 526--536.
• 18: Wallach, H. 1959. The perception of motion. Scientific American. July, 56--60.
• 19: Colin Ware , Glenn Franck, Evaluating stereo and motion cues for visualizing information nets in three dimensions, ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), v.15 n.2, p.121-140, April 1996 [doi>10.1145/234972.234975]
• 20: Wheatstone, C. 1838. Contributions to the physiology of vision. Pert the first. On some remarkable and hitherto unobserved phenomena of binocular vision. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society. 128, 371--394.
• 21: Malte Zöckler , Detlev Stalling , Hans-Christian Hege, Interactive visualization of 3D-vector fields using illuminated stream lines, Proceedings of the 7th conference on Visualization '96, p.107-ff., October 28-29, 1996, San Francisco, California, United States

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.5 INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION (I.7)
      H.5.2 User Interfaces (D.2.2, H.1.2, I.3.6)

Keywords:
depth cues, flow visualization, stereo viewing