ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
The role of asynchronous discussions in increasing the effectiveness of remote synchronous requirements negotiations
Full text PdfPdf (77 KB)
Source International Conference on Software Engineering archive
Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Software engineering table of contents
Shanghai, China
SESSION: Emerging results: requirements engineering table of contents
Pages: 917 - 920  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:1-59593-375-1
Authors
Daniela Damian  University of Victoria, BC, Canada
Filippo Lanubile  University of Bari, Bari, Italy
Teresa Mallardo  University of Bari, Bari, Italy
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGSOFT: ACM Special Interest Group on Software Engineering
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 19,   Downloads (12 Months): 121,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1134285.1134452
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Important and yet very difficult process in software development, requirements engineering is plagued with additional challenges in the emergent dynamics of geographically distributed software teams. Our hypothesis is that a mix of lean and rich communication media are needed towards increasing the effectiveness of meetings in reaching mutual agreement when stakeholders are geographically dispersed.We studied tool-supported remote inspections in six educational global project teams in a multicultural software development environment. In this paper we present the preliminary results from comparing the effectiveness of the requirements negotiations when preceded by the asynchronous discussions to those negotiations with no prior asynchronous discussions.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
Andres, H.P. A Comparison of Face-to-Face and Virtual Software Development Teams. Team Performance Management: An International Journal, 8, 1/2 (2002), 39--48.
 
3
Boehm, B., Bose, P., Horowitz, E., and Lee, M.J. Software Requirements as Negotiated Win Conditions. In Proc. of the ICRE, (Colorado, 1994).
 
4
Clark, H.H., and Brennan, S.E. Grounding in Communication. In L.B. Resnick, R.M. Levine and S.D. Teasley (eds.). Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC. 1991.
 
5
Damian, D.E., Eberlein, A., Shaw, M.L.G., and Gaines, B.R. The effects of communication media on group performance in requirements engineering. IEEE Software, (2000), 28--36.
 
6
 
7
Damian, D., and Zowghi, D. Requirements Engineering challenges in multi-site software development organizations. Requirements Engineering Journal, 8 (2003), 149--160.
 
8
 
9
Lanubile, F., Mallardo, T., and Calefato, F. Tool Support for Geographically Dispersed Inspection Teams. Software Process: Improvement and Practice, 8, 4 (2003), 217--231.
 
10
11
12
 
13
Olson, G.M., and Olson, J.S. Distance matters. Human-Computer Interaction, 15 (2000), 139--179.
 
14
 
15
16
 
17
Short, J., Williams, E., and Christie, B. The social psychology of telecommunications, Wiley&Sons, New York, 1976.
 
18
19


Collaborative Colleagues:
Daniela Damian: colleagues
Filippo Lanubile: colleagues
Teresa Mallardo: colleagues