|
ABSTRACT
Delegation of authority is an important process that needs to be captured by any access control model. In role-based access control models, delegation of authority involves delegating roles that a user can assume or the set of permissions that he can acquire, to other users. Several role-based delegation models have been proposed in the literature. However, these models consider delegation in presence of the general hierarchy type. Multiple hierarchy types have been proposed in the context of Generalized Temporal Role-based Access Control (GTRBAC) model, where it has been shown that multiple hierarchy semantics is desirable to express fine-grained access control policies. In this paper, we address role-based delegation schemes in the of hybrid hierarchies and elaborate on fine-grained delegation schemes. In particular, we show that upward delegation, which has been considered as having no practical use, is a desirable feature. Furthermore, we show that accountability must be considered as an important factor during the delegation process. The delegation framework proposed subsumes delegations schemes proposed in earlier role-based delegation models and provide much more fine-grained control of delegation semantics.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
 |
1
|
|
| |
2
|
E. Barka and R. Sandhu, A Role-Based Delegation Model and Some Extensions, Proc. of 23rd National Information Systems Security Conference, Dec, 2000.
|
| |
3
|
|
| |
4
|
D. F. Ferraiolo, D. M. Gilbert, and N Lynch. An Examination of Federal and Commercial Access Control Policy Needs. In Proceedings of NISTNCSC National Computer Security Conference, pages 107--116, Baltimore, MD, September 20-23 1993.
|
 |
5
|
|
| |
6
|
M. Gasser, E. McDermott, An Architecture for practical Delegation in a Distributed System, 1990 IEEE Computer Society Symposium on Research in Security and Privacy. May, 1990.
|
| |
7
|
L. Giuri. Role-based access control: A natural approach. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM Workshop on Role-Based Access Control. ACM, 1997.
|
 |
8
|
|
| |
9
|
|
 |
10
|
|
 |
11
|
|
| |
12
|
J. B. D. Joshi, E. Bertino, A. Ghafoor. Hybrid Temporal Role Hierarchies in GTRBAC. Submitted to ACM Transactions on Information and System Security.
|
| |
13
|
|
| |
14
|
R.W.C. Lui and L.C.K. Hui, A Model for Delegation of Accountability, IASTED International Conference on Software Engineering, SE 2004.
|
| |
15
|
J. D. Moffett, Delegation of Authority Using Domain Based Access Rules, PhD Thesis. Dept of Computing, Imperial College, University of London. 1990.
|
| |
16
|
N. Nagaratnam, D. Lea, Secure Delegation for Distributed Object Environments, USENIX Conference on Object Oriented Technologies and Systems. April, 1998.
|
 |
17
|
|
| |
18
|
|
| |
19
|
|
 |
20
|
|
 |
21
|
|
| |
22
|
|
 |
23
|
|
 |
24
|
|
 |
25
|
|
| |
26
|
X. Zhang, S. Oh and R. Sandhu, PBDM: A Flexible Delegation Model in RBAC http://www.list.gmu.edu/confrnc/sacmat/2003_pbdm.pdf, SACMAT 2003.
|
 |
27
|
|
CITED BY
|
|
Quan Pham , Jason Reid , Adrian McCullagh , Ed Dawson, Commitment issues in delegation process, Proceedings of the sixth Australasian conference on Information security, January 01-01, 2008, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
|
|