Reflections on network architecture: an active networking perspective

ABSTRACT

After a long period when networking research seemed to be focused mainly on making the existing Internet work better, interest in "clean slate" approaches to network architecture seems to be growing. Beginning with the DARPA program in the mid-1990's, researchers working on active networks explored such an approach, based on the idea of a programming interface as the basic interoperability mechanism of the network. This note draws on the author's experiences in that effort and attempts to extract some observations or "lessons learned" that may be relevant to more general network architecture research.

REFERENCES

• 1: D. Alexander, W. Arbaugh, M. Hicks, P. Kakkar, A. Keromytis, J. Moore, C. Gunter, S. Nettles, and J. Smith. The Switchware Active Network Architecture. IEEE Network Special Issue on Active and Controllable Networks, 12(3):29--36, 1998.
• 2: Y. Chae , E. Zegura, CANEs: An Execution Environment for Composable Services, Proceedings of the 2002 DARPA Active Networks Conference and Exposition, p.255, May 29-30, 2002
• 3: K. Calvert, J. Griffioen, B. Mullins, A. Sehgal, and S. Wen. Concast: Design and implementation of an active network service. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas of Communications, 19(3), March 2001.
• 4: Kenneth L. Calvert , James Griffioen , Su Wen, Lightweight network support for scalable end-to-end services, Proceedings of the 2002 conference on Applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communications, August 19-23, 2002, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
• 5: D. Clark et al. New arch: Future generation network architecture (final technical report), 2004. http://www.isi.edu/newarch/iDOCS/final.finalreport.pdf.
• 6: D. Clark, The design philosophy of the DARPA internet protocols, Symposium proceedings on Communications architectures and protocols, p.106-114, August 16-18, 1988, Stanford, California, United States
• 7: K. L. Calvert (editor). Architectural Framework for Active Networks. DARPA Active Networks Working Group Draft, December 2001.
• 8: L. L. Peterson (editor). NodeOS Interface specification. DARPA Active Networks Working Group Draft, January 2001.
• 9: S. Murphy (editor). Security Architecture for Active Nets. DARPA Active Networks Working Group Draft, November 2001.
• 10: D. Scott Alexander et. al. Active Network Encapsulation Protocol (ANEP), 1997. http://www.cis.upenn.edu/dsl/switchware/ANEP/.
• 11: Sally Floyd , Vern Paxson, Difficulties in simulating the internet, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking (TON), v.9 n.4, p.392-403, August 2001 [doi>10.1109/90.944338]
• 12: National Science Foundation. Future internet design program. http://find.isi.edu.
• 13: Timothy G. Griffin , Gordon Wilfong, An analysis of BGP convergence properties, Proceedings of the conference on Applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communication, p.277-288, August 30-September 03, 1999, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States
• 14: Michael Hicks , Pankaj Kakkar , Jonathan T. Moore , Carl A. Gunter , Scott Nettles, PLAN: a packet language for active networks, Proceedings of the third ACM SIGPLAN international conference on Functional programming, p.86-93, September 26-29, 1998, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
• 15: L. Peterson, Y. Gottlieb, M. Hibler, P. Tullmann, J. Lepreau, S. Schwab, H. Dandekar, A. Purtell, and J. Hartman. An OS Interface for Active Routers. IEEE Journal on Selected areas of Communicasitons, 19(3), March 2001.
• 16: Barath Raghavan , Alex C. Snoeren, A system for authenticated policy-compliant routing, Proceedings of the 2004 conference on Applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communications, August 30-September 03, 2004, Portland, Oregon, USA
• 17: Jonathan M. Smith , Kenneth L. Calvert , Sandra L. Murphy , Hilarie K. Orman , Larry L. Peterson, Activating Networks: A Progress Report, Computer, v.32 n.4, p.32-41, April 1999 [doi>10.1109/2.755003]
• 18: David L. Tennenhouse , David J. Wetherall, Towards an active network architecture, ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, v.26 n.2, p.5-17, April 1996 [doi>10.1145/231699.231701]
• 19: Christian F. Tschudin. The Messenger Environment M0 - a Condensed Description. http://cui.unige.ch/tios/msgr/m0/doc/overview.html, May 1997.
• 20: David J. Wetherall, John V. Guttag, and David L. Tennenhouse. ANTS: A Toolkit for Building and Dynamically Deploying Network Protocols. In IEEE OPENARCH '98, April 1998.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  C. Computer Systems Organization
  C.2 COMPUTER-COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
      C.2.1 Network Architecture and Design
          Subjects: Packet-switching networks

Additional Classification:
  C. Computer Systems Organization
  C.2 COMPUTER-COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
      C.2.2 Network Protocols
          Subjects: Protocol architecture (OSI model)

General Terms:
Design, Experimentation