ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
On the complexity of sign-nonsingularity and equal unions of sets
Full text PdfPdf (264 KB)
Source ACM Southeast Regional Conference archive
Proceedings of the 38th annual on Southeast regional conference table of contents
Clemson, South Carolina
SESSION: Applications table of contents
Pages: 232 - 234  
Year of Publication: 2000
ISBN:1-58113-250-6
Authors
David P. Jacobs  Clemson University, Clemson, SC
Robert E. Jamison  Clemson University, Clemson, SC
Alice A. McRae  Appalachian State Univ., Boone, NC
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 0,   Downloads (12 Months): 2,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1127716.1127767
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

A family of nonempty sets has the equal union property (EUP) if and only if there exist two nonempty disjoint subfamilies having the same union. If, in addition, every set in the family is used, we have the full equal union property (FEUP). A family with more sets than points always has the equal union property. On the other hand, if there are more points than sets, recognizing both the EUP and FEUP is NP-complete. A recent striking and difficult result by Robertson, Seymour, Thomas, and independently, McCuaig, implies that for square families (the same number of sets as points) recognition of the EUP is polynomial-time. In contrast to this, we give a simple argument below to show that FEUP is NP-complete in the square case.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
E. J. Cockayne, R. M. Dawes and S. T. Hedetniemi, Total domination in graphs, Networks 10 (1980) 211--219.
 
2
 
3
B. Green, D. Olesky, and P. van den Driessche, Classes of sign nonsingular matrices with a specified number of zero elements, Linear Algebra and Its Applications 248 (1996) 253--275.
 
4
 
5
D. P. Jacobs and R. E. Jamison, Complexity of Recognizing Equal Unions in Families of Sets, submitted.
 
6
V. Klee, R. Ladner, and R. Manber, Signsolvability revisited, Linear Algebra and Its Applications, 59 (1984), 131--157.
 
7
B. Lindström, A theorem on families of sets, J. of Combinatorial Theory (A) 13 (1972), 274--277.
 
8
T. J. Lundy, J. Maybee, and J. Van Buskirk, On maximal sign-nonsingular matrices, Linear Algebra and Its Applications, 247 (1996), 55--81.
 
9
J. Maybee and J. Quirk, Qualitative problems in matrix theory, SIAM Review 11 (1969), 30--51.
 
10
W. McCuaig, Pólya's permanent problem, manuscript (93 pages), June, 1997, submitted to Electronic J. of Comb.
11
 
12
N. Robertson, P. D. Seymour, and R. Thomas, Permanents, Pfaffian orientations, and even directed circuits, Annals of Math. (to appear).
 
13
C. Thomassen, Sign-nonsingular matrices and even cycles in directed graphs, Linear Algebra and Its Applications, 75 (1986), 27--41.
 
14
H. Tverberg, On equal unions of sets, in Studies in Pure Mathematics, edited by L. Mirsky, Academic Press, London, 1971, 249--250.
Collaborative Colleagues:
David P. Jacobs: colleagues
Robert E. Jamison: colleagues
Alice A. McRae: colleagues