Expert systems in alternative dispute resolution

Subscribe (Full Service)


	Search: The ACM Digital Library The Guide

	Feedback

Expert systems in alternative dispute resolution

Full text

Pdf (911 KB)

Source

International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law archive
Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Artificial intelligence and law table of contents

Oxford, England

Pages: 207 - 214

Year of Publication: 1991

ISBN:0-89791-399-X

Authors

Michael L. Kayman	U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Construction Engineering Research Lab., Champaign, IL
Moonja P. Kim	U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Construction Engineering Research Lab., Champaign, IL

Sponsor

SIGART: ACM Special Interest Group on Artificial Intelligence

Publisher

ACM New York, NY, USA

Bibliometrics

Downloads (6 Weeks): 0, Downloads (12 Months): 10, Citation Count: 0

Additional Information:

references index terms collaborative colleagues peer to peer

Tools and Actions:	Request Permissions Review this Article Save this Article to a Binder Display Formats: BibTeX EndNote ACM Ref

DOI Bookmark:	Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/112646.112672 What is a DOI?

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

	1	This paper will focus principally on government construction contracts and disputes arising from such contracts.
	2	124 Cong. Rec. 36,264 (1978). Senator Byrd explained' "It is still the policy of Congress that contractor claims should be resolved by mutual agreemettt, in lieu of litigation, to the maximum extent possible .... " I d. at 36,267.
	3	Lteberman & Henry, Lessons From the Alte..r..n.a.t_ive DtsDute Resolution Movement, 53 U. Cht. L. Rev. 424, 425 (1986).
	4	Frankel, Partisan Jus~ic~ 3-69 (1981).
	5	See Menkel-Meadow, Toward Another View of Lemal Ne~otlatlon' The Structure of ?roblem soiv%ng, 31 UGLA L. Rev. 754, 783-89 (1984).
	6	Se___ee Stipanovich, Punitive Damages in Arbitration, 66 B.U.L. Rev. 953 (1986).
	7	E.g. Korthals-Altes, The ADDlicability of Alternative Di. spute -- Resolution Technioues to Government Defense Contract Disputes, reprinted. ~ i~n Administrative Conference of the United States, Sourcebook 147 (1986) {hereinafter ADR Sourcebook}.
	8	See 1 C.F.R. ~ 305.86-3 (1989) ; Id. ~ 305.84-4; I_dd. ~ 305.82-2.
	9	Memorandum on Alternative Dispute Resolution Update from Frank Carr, Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers (Mar. 20, 1987), reprinted in ADR Sourcebook, su__~_r_~ note 32, at 587
	10	Edelman & Carr, The Mini-Trial' An Alternative Dispute Resolution Procedure, 42 Arb. J. 7, 14 (1987).
	11	Corps of Engineers' Mini-Trial Considered Success' Prozram to be Expanded, 43 Fed. Gont. Rep. (BNA) 259 (Feb. 11, 1985).
	12	Ctbintc & Nash, Administration of Government Contracts (2d ed.) (1985), at 267.
	13	See supra note 47, and accompanying text.
	14	Cibintc & Nash, su__qp_L~ note 48, at 267-348.
	15	Anne von der Lieth Gardner, An artificial intelligence approach to legal reasoning, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1987
	16	Donald H. Berman , Carole D. Hafner, The potential of artificial intelligence to help solve the crisis in our legal system, Communications of the ACM, v.32 n.8, p.928-938, Aug. 1989 [doi>10.1145/65971.65972]
	17	I d. at 928.
	18	See also Nage 1 & Barc zyk, Ca__Bn Computers Aid the DisQute Resolution Process/, 71 Judicature 253, 294- 95 (1988).
	19	Nagel, .AD~. l~in~ Mieroeomputer~ to Di.spute Resolution (I987); Nagel & Mills, M .i.c. rocomputers. P/G%. and Dispute Resolution, 2 Ohio St. J. of Dispute Resolution 187 (Spr. 1987)
	20	R. E. Susskind, The latent damage system: a jurisprudential analysis, Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, p.23-32, May 1989, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada [doi>10.1145/74014.74018]