Representing and reasoning about open-textured predicates

Subscribe (Full Service)


	Search: The ACM Digital Library The Guide

	Feedback

Representing and reasoning about open-textured predicates

Full text

Pdf (869 KB)

Source

International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law archive
Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Artificial intelligence and law table of contents

Oxford, England

Pages: 137 - 144

Year of Publication: 1991

ISBN:0-89791-399-X

Author

Kathryn E. Sanders

Department of Computer Science, Box 1910, Brown University, Providence, RI

Sponsor

SIGART: ACM Special Interest Group on Artificial Intelligence

Publisher

ACM New York, NY, USA

Bibliometrics

Downloads (6 Weeks): 0, Downloads (12 Months): 11, Citation Count: 6

Additional Information:

references cited by index terms collaborative colleagues

Tools and Actions:	Request Permissions Review this Article Save this Article to a Binder Display Formats: BibTeX EndNote ACM Ref

DOI Bookmark:	Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/112646.112663 What is a DOI?

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

	Allen et. al., 1990	llen, James; Hendler, james; and Tate, Austin 1990. Readings in Planning. Morgan Kaufman, San Mateo, California.
	Ashley, 1988	Kevin D. Ashley, Modelling legal argument: reasoning with cases and hypotheticals, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, 1988
	Bench-Capon and Sergot, 1988	Bench-Capon, Trevor and Sergot, Marek j. 1988. Towards a rule-based representation of open texture in law. in Computer power and legal language. Quorum Books, New York. 39-60.
	Gardner, 1987	Anne von der Lieth Gardner, An artificial intelligence approach to legal reasoning, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1987
	McCarty and Sridharan, 1982	McCarty, L. Thorne and Sridharan, N.S. 1982. A computational theory of legal argument. Technical Report LRP-TR-13, Laboratory for Computer Science Research, Rutgers University.
	McCarty, 1977	McCarty, L. Thorne 1977. Reflections on TAXMAN' an experiment in artificial intelligence and legal reasoning. Harvard Law Review 90:837-893.
	McCarty, 1980	McCarty, L. Thorne 1980. The TAX- MAN project' towards a cognitive theory of legal argument. In Niblett, Bryan, editor 1980, Computer Science and Law. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England. 23-43.
	McCarty, 1983	McCarty, L. Thorne 1983. Permissions and obligations. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Karlsruhe, West Germany. 287-294.
	McCarty, 1989a	McCarty, L. Thorne 1989a. Computing with prototypes (preliminary report). In Proceedings of the Bar-ilan Symposium on the Foundations of Artificial Intelligence.
	McCarty, 1989b	L. T. McCarty, A language for legal Discourse I. basic features, Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, p.180-189, May 1989, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada [doi>10.1145/74014.74037]
	Rissland and Skalak, 1991	Edwina L. Rissland , David B. Skalak, CABARET: rule interpretation in a hybrid architecture, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, v.34 n.6, p.839-887, June 1991 [doi>10.1016/0020-7373(91)90013-W]
	Sanders, 1991	Kathryn Elizabeth Sanders, Chiron: planning in an open-textured domain, Brown University, Providence, RI, 1996
	Schlobohm and McCarty, 1989	D. A. Schlobohm , L. T. McCarty, EPS II: estate planning with prototypes, Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, p.1-10, May 1989, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada [doi>10.1145/74014.74015]
	Shoham, 1988	Yoav Shoham, Reasoning about change: time and causation from the standpoint of artificial intelligence, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1988
	Steels, 1990	Luc Steels, Components of expertise, AI Magazine, v.11 n.2, p.30-49, Summer 1990

CITED BY 6

	Katsumi Nitta , Stephen Wong , Yoshihisa Ohtake, A computational model for trial reasoning, Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, p.20-29, June 15-18, 1993, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
	Shawn Kerrigan , Kincho H. Law, Logic-based regulation compliance-assistance, Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, June 24-28, 2003, Scotland, United Kingdom
	N. Hutton , A. Patterson , C. Tata, Decision support for sentencing in a common law jurisdiction, Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, p.89-95, May 21-24, 1995, College Park, Maryland, United States
	Vincent Aleven , Kevin D. Ashley, Doing things with factors, Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, p.31-41, May 21-24, 1995, College Park, Maryland, United States
	Cees Groendijk , Anja Oskamp, Case recognition and strategy classification, Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, p.125-132, June 15-18, 1993, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
	Jaap Hage, Teleological reasoning in reason-based logic, Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, p.11-20, May 21-24, 1995, College Park, Maryland, United States