ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
A comparative illustration of AI planning-based web services composition
Full text PdfPdf (142 KB)
Source ACM SIGecom Exchanges archive
Volume 5 ,  Issue 5  (January 2006) table of contents
Pages: 1 - 10  
Year of Publication: 2006
Authors
Seog-Chan Oh  Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering department, Penn State University
Dongwon Lee  School of IST, Penn State University
Soundar R. T. Kumara  Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering department, Penn State University
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 8,   Downloads (12 Months): 100,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1124566.1124568
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

As the number of available web services proliferates, finding right web services to fulfill a given goal becomes an important task. In particular, a problem of combining multiple web services to satisfy a single task, known as web services composition problem, has received much attention recently, and various solutions have been proposed. Among many proposed solutions, however, it is not clear to use which one in what scenarios. In this paper, to this end, we present: (1) a taxonomy and decision guideline of available solution spaces; (2) an overview of syntactic and semantic matching approaches, and (3) a comparative illustration of three representative solutions from the perspective of e-service workflows.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
BERNERS-LEE, T., HENDLER, J., AND LASSILA. O. 2001. The Semantic Web. Scientific American.
 
3
BILENKO, M., COHEN, W. W., FIENBERG, S., MOONEY R. J., AND RAVIKUMAR P. 2003. Adaptive name matching in information integration. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 18(5).
 
4
BLUM A., AND FURST, M.L. 1995. Fast planning through planning graph analysis. In Proceedings of IJCAI.
 
5
 
6
CANTERA, M. 2004. IT professional services forecast and trends for web services. ITES-WW-MT-0116, Gartner Inc.
 
7
DOAN, A., MADHAVAN, J., DOMINGOS, P., AND HALEVY, A. 2004. Handbook on ontologies in information systems, STAAB, S. AND STUDER, R. (eds.), Springer-Velag.
 
8
FIKES, R. E., AND NILSSON, N. 1971. STRIPS: A new approach to the application of theorem proving to problem solving. Artificial Intelligence, 5(2).
 
9
GHANDEHARIZADEH, S. (et al.) 2003. Proteus: a system for dynamically composing and intelligently executing web services. In Proceedings of Int'l Conf. On Web Services (ICWS).
 
10
 
11
 
12
PONNEKANTI, S. R., AND FOX, A. 2002. SWORD: A developer toolkit for web service composition. In Proceedings of WWW, Honolulu, HI.
 
13
RAO, J., AND SU, X. 2004. A survey of automated web service composition methods, In Proceedings of SWSWPC.
 
14
 
15
SIVASHANMUGAM, K., VERMA, K., SHETH, A., AND MILLER, J. 2003. Adding semantics to web services standards. In Proceedings of Int'l Conf. On Web Services (ICWS).
 
16
 
17
WELD, D. S. 1999. Recent advances in AI planning. AI Magazine, 20(2).

Collaborative Colleagues:
Seog-Chan Oh: colleagues
Dongwon Lee: colleagues
Soundar R. T. Kumara: colleagues