ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Leakage control through fine-grained placement and sizing of sleep transistors
Full text PdfPdf (732 KB)
Source International Conference on Computer Aided Design archive
Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE/ACM International conference on Computer-aided design table of contents
Pages: 533 - 536  
Year of Publication: 2004
ISBN:0-7803-8702-3
Authors
V. Khandelwal  Dept. of Electr. & Comput. Eng., Maryland Univ., College Park, MD, USA
A. Srivastava  Dept. of Electr. & Comput. Eng., Maryland Univ., College Park, MD, USA
Publisher
IEEE Computer Society  Washington, DC, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 1,   Downloads (12 Months): 25,   Citation Count: 11
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: 10.1109/ICCAD.2004.1382635

ABSTRACT

Leakage power is increasingly gaining importance with technology scaling. Multi-threshold CMOS (MTCMOS) technology has become a popular technique for standby power reduction. Sleep transistor insertion in circuits is an effective application of MTCMOS technology for reducing leakage power. In This work we present a fine grained approach where each gate in the circuit is provided an independent sleep transistor. Key advantages of this approach include better circuit slack utilization and improvements in signal integrity (which is a major disadvantage in clustering based approaches). To this end, we propose an optimal polynomial time fine grained sleep transistor sizing algorithm. We also prove the selective sleep transistor placement problem as NP-complete and propose an effective heuristic. Finally, in order to reduce the sleep transistor area penalty (which might get high since clustering is not performed), we propose a placement area constrained sleep transistor sizing formulation. Our experiments show that on an average the sleep transistor placement and optimal sizing algorithm gave 69.7% and 59.0% savings in leakage power as compared to the conventional fixed delay penalty algorithms for 5 and 7% circuit slowdown respectively. Moreover the post placement area penalty was less than 5% which is comparable to clustering schemes according to Mohab Anis et al. (2003).


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
2
3
4
 
5
[5] E.M. Sentovich, K.J. Singh, L. Lavagno, C. Moon, R. Murgai, A. Saldanha, H. Savoj, P.R. Stephan, R.K. Brayton, A.L. Sangiovanni-Vincentelli. SIS: A System for Sequential Circuit Synthesis. Memorandum No. UCB/ERL M92/41, Department of EECS, UC Berkeley, May 1992.
 
6
7
 
8
[8] J. Kao and A. Chandrakasan. "MTCMOS Sequential Circuits". In Procs of ESSDERC, Sept 2003.
9
 
10
[10] Mohab Anis et al. "Design and Optimization of Multithreshold CMOS (MTCMOS) Circuits". In IEEE Transactions on CAD of integrated Circuits and Systems, October 2003.
 
11
12
 
13
[13] S. Mutoh et al. "I-V Power Supply High Speed Digital Circuit Technology with Multithreshold-Voltage CMOS". In IEEE JSSC, vol. 30, no. 8, August 1995.

CITED BY  12
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Collaborative Colleagues:
V. Khandelwal: colleagues
A. Srivastava: colleagues