ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Studying document usability: grasping the nettles
Full text PdfPdf (254 KB)
Source ACM SIGDOC Asterisk Journal of Computer Documentation archive
Volume 15 ,  Issue 2  (September 1991) table of contents
Pages: 37 - 40  
Year of Publication: 1991
ISSN:0731-1001
Author
Judith Ramey  University of Washington
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 3,   Downloads (12 Months): 15,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1111136.1111141
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

I first read "Improving the usability of programming publications" by Bethke et al. ten years ago when I was writing hardware manuals for a computer company.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
Gould, E., and Doheny-Farina, S. (1988). Studying usability in the field: qualitative research techniques for technical communicators. In S. Doheny-Farina (Ed.), Effective Documentation: What We Have Learned From Research (pp. 329--343). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
 
3
Grice, R. (Guest Ed.) (1991). Special section: Suability. Technical Communication, 38(2), 178--196.
 
4
 
5
Karat, C. (1990b). Cost-benefit analysis of usability engineering techniques. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society (pp. 839--843). Orlando, FL: Human Factors Society.
6
 
7
Ramey, J. (Guest Ed.) (1989). IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 34(4), whole issue.