ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Printing in today's academic labs: not exactly what Gutenberg had in mind
Full text PdfPdf (176 KB)
Source User Services Conference archive
Proceedings of the 33rd annual ACM SIGUCCS conference on User services table of contents
Monterey, CA, USA
Pages: 105 - 108  
Year of Publication: 2005
ISBN:1-59593-200-3
Authors
Scott Hanselman  Ringling School of Art and Design, Sarasota, FL
David Przybyla  Ringling School of Art and Design, Sarasota, FL
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGUCCS: ACM Special Interest Group on University and College Computing Services
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 5,   Downloads (12 Months): 38,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1099435.1099459
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

At the Ringling School of Art and Design, we have watched printing costs spiral out of control and beyond budgetary models. Yearly expenditures for both printer consumables and the labor required to maintain our printers have been substantial. With approximately 25 black and white and 11 color network laser printers in our academic labs, we required a user friendly, flexible, and stable method of print accounting.Over the past two semesters we examined and tested many print accounting solutions. Our first iteration of testing used a Macintosh OS X Server and subsequent tests included various Open Source alternatives. We ultimately deployed an off-the-shelf solution called Print Manager Plus installed on a Windows 2000 server with minor modifications to the reporting feature. Advantages of this solution include, but are not limited to, straightforward incorporation of our Active Directory Domain users and groups, maintaining a level of transparency to the users, and multi-platform support.Our quota system is based on academic year and major and all students are given a number of free prints based on these criteria. Students may also purchase additional prints via a web interface if necessary.Print Manager Plus was not our first choice, or even our second, but proved to be the best choice overall. This paper will share our mistakes as well as our successes and will hopefully help our peers control their rising printing costs.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Apple Mac OS X Printing, http://www.apple.com/macosx/features/printing/.
 
2
Apple Mac OS X Server Features, http://www.apple.com/server/macosx/features/fileprint.html/.
 
3
Common UNIX Printing System, http://www.cups.org/.
 
4
Crystal Reports Solutions, http://www.businessobjects.com/solutions/crystalreports/default.asp.
 
5
Hewlett Packard Print Server Appliances, http://h10010.www1.hp.com/wwpc/us/en/sm/WF02a/18972-236253-64451.html/.
 
6
Pcounter, http://www.andtechnologies.com/pcounter.html/.
 
7
Pharos Uniprint, http://www.pharos.com/products/uniprint.asp.
 
8
Print Audit, http://www.printaudit.com/.
 
9
Print Manager Plus Academic, http://www.softwareshelf.com/files/products.asp?ID=121.
 
10
Pykota, http://www.librelogiciel.com/software/PyKota/action_Presentation/.
 
11
Ringling School of Art and Design, http://www.rsad.edu/.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Scott Hanselman: colleagues
David Przybyla: colleagues