ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
From relative to observable proportional differentiation in OBS networks
Full text PdfPdf (282 KB)
Source International Conference On Emerging Networking Experiments And Technologies archive
Proceedings of the 2005 ACM conference on Emerging network experiment and technology table of contents
Toulouse, France
SESSION: Traffic engineering table of contents
Pages: 115 - 123  
Year of Publication: 2005
ISBN:1-59593-197-X
Authors
Pablo Argibay-Losada  Universidade de Vigo, Vigo, Spain
Andrés Suárez-González  Universidade de Vigo, Vigo, Spain
Manuel Fernández-Veiga  Universidade de Vigo, Vigo, Spain
Raúl Rodríguez-Rubio  Universidade de Vigo, Vigo, Spain
Cándido López-García  Universidade de Vigo, Vigo, Spain
Sponsor
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 2,   Downloads (12 Months): 19,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1095921.1095937
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This paper addresses the provision of proportional differentiated services to an arbitrary number of traffic classes in terms of the class packet loss probability measured between the ingress node and the egress node of an OBS network. Our solution relies on a key idea: OBS networks consist of bufferless nodes and can therefore be regarded as a whole like a one-hop bufferless subnetwork characterized by a collection of loss probabilities computable with simple, approximate circuit switching models. Consequently, we believe it is possible to attain packet loss proportionality merely using a simple stochastic algorithm to assemble two classes of bursts, provided there exists some form of internal relative differentiation such that one of the burst classes has a much lower loss probability than the other. In order to evaluate the algorithm accuracy in attaining the proportionality, we present an analytical study of two idealized scenarios (a single link and a multi-node symmetrical network), including the effect caused by the flow dynamics of the traffic received at the ingress nodes. Our results show that, despite its simplicity, this approach is able to provide the desired proportionality over a wide range of operating conditions.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
S. Blake, D. Black, M. E. Davies, Z. Wang, W. Weiss. An Architecture for Differentiated Services. RFC 2475, dec. 1998.
 
2
C. Dovrolis, P. Ramanathan. A Case for Relative Differentiated Services and the Proportional Differentiation Model. IEEE Network Mag., vol. 13(5), pp. 26--34, sep. 1999.
 
3
 
4
Y. Chen, C. Qiao. Proportional differentiation: A scalable QoS approach. IEEE Communications Mag., jun. 2003, pp. 52--58.
 
5
Y. Chen, M. Handi, D. H. K. Tsang. Proportional QoS over OBS networks. Proc. Globecom 2001, pp. 1510--1514.
 
6
H. C. Cankaya, S. Charcranoon, T. S. El-Bawab. A preemptive scheduling technique for OBS networks with service differentiation. Proc. Globecom 2003, pp. 2704--2708.
 
7
C.-W. Tan, M. Gurusamy, J. C.-S. Lui. Achieving proportional loss differentiation using probabilistic preemptive burst segmentation in optical burst switching WDM networks. Proc. Globecom 2004, pp. 1754--1758.
 
8
V. M. Vokkarane, J. P. Jue. Prioritized burst segmentation and composite burst-assembly techniques for QoS support in optical burst-switched networks. IEEE J. on Select. Areas in Comm., vol. 21, pp. 1198--1209, sep. 2003.
 
9
M. Yoo, C. Qiao, S. Dixit. QoS performance of optical burst switching in IP-over-WDM networks. IEEE J. on Select. Areas in Comm., vol. 18, pp. 2062--2071, oct. 2000.
 
10
F. Farahmand, J. Jue. Supporting QoS with look-ahead window contention resolution in optical burst switched networks. Proc. Globecom 2003, pp. 2699--2703.
 
11
M. Handley, S. Floyd, J. Padhye and J. Widmer. TCP Friendly Rate Control (TFRC): Protocol Specification. RFC 3448, Jan. 2003.
 
12
 
13
A. Detti and M. Listanti, Impact of Segments Aggregation on TCP Reno Flows in Optical Burst Switching Networks, Proceedings of INFOCOMM, vol. 3, pp. 1803--1812, 2002.
 
14
M. Izal and J. Aracil,On the Influence of Self-similarity on Optical Burst Switching Traffic, Proceedings of GLOBECOM, vol. 3, pp. 17--21, 2002.
 
15
Z. Rosberg, H. Vu, M. Zukerman, J. White Blocking Probabilities of Optical Burst Switching Networks Based on Reduced Load Fixed Point Approximations. Proc. IEEE Infocom 2003.
 
16
 
17
H. L. Vu and M. Zukerman,Blocking Probability for Priority Classes in Optical Burst Switching Networks, IEEE Communications Letters, vol. 6, num. 5, pp. 214--216, May. 2002.
 
18
K. Dolzer, C. Gauger, J. Späth and S. Bodamer, Evaluation of Reservation Mechanisms for Optical Burst Switching, AEÜ Int. J. Electron. Commun., vol. 55, num. 1

Collaborative Colleagues:
Pablo Argibay-Losada: colleagues
Andrés Suárez-González: colleagues
Manuel Fernández-Veiga: colleagues
Raúl Rodríguez-Rubio: colleagues
Cándido López-García: colleagues