ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Scenario based method for teaching, learning and assessment
Full text PdfPdf (249 KB)
Source Conference On Information Technology Education (formerly CITC) archive
Proceedings of the 6th conference on Information technology education table of contents
Newark, NJ, USA
SESSION: Methods of IT teaching and learning 1 table of contents
Pages: 261 - 266  
Year of Publication: 2005
ISBN:1-59593-252-6
Authors
Rahat Iqbal  Eindhoven University of Technology, The Netherlands
Peter Every  Coventry University, UK
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGITE: ACM Special Interest Group on Information Technology Education
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 10,   Downloads (12 Months): 88,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1095714.1095775
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This paper presents some reflections upon the use of a flexible, scenario based, teaching learning and assessment method (TLA) for the delivery of a third level module in Human Computer Interaction (HCI) in a UK university. The method is designed to encourage problem-solving skills amongst students within a delivery framework that is highly flexible and based around dialogue.In the delivery of the course, we have identified seven topic areas that encompass the HCI curriculum and have introduced the notion of 'topic cycles' in which each curriculum area is introduced, researched and discussed before the students are assessed. The cycle applied to the seven topic areas involves the following steps: An introductory lecture, an assessment briefing, group based research and discussion phase, support sessions with online resources and a final assessed seminar. Student feedback, both formal and informal, regularly expresses satisfaction with the method as participants feel that they are treated fairly and maturely.Through this method, we intend to encourage students to adopt a discursive, problem-solving approach to learning and attempt to address the reactive 'surface learning' strategy demonstrated by many students - a problem identified by many studies in Higher Education.The key benefit of this method is its applicability to courses with large cohorts whilst retaining a high degree of student involvement and satisfaction.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Chris McKillop (1997): On-line study guides for distance education, students: can 'advisor' agents help? Dissertation for MSc in Human-Centred Computer Systems, School of Cognitive and Computing Sciences, University of Sussex.
 
2
Joughin, G., Lai, T., and Cottman, C. (1992): Distance Learners' Approaches to Studying: the Nature of 'Deep' and Surface' Approaches Reconsidered, Draft paper for the International Council for Distance Education 16th World Conference 'Distance education for the twenty-first century.
 
3
Chris McKillop (1998:) Improving the quality of the student's learning experience: an agent-based approach to on-line study guides, Technical Report No. KMI-TR-72, Open University, UK
4
 
5
 
6
James Rhem, (1998), "Problem-Based Learning: An Introduction", Featured Article, Vol. 8 No. 1. Available via http://www.ntlf.com/html/pi/9812/pbl_1.htm
7
 
8
Ram, A. & Francis, A.G. (1996). Multi-Plan Adaptation and Retrieval in an Experience-based Agent. In David Leake, Ed., Case-Based Reasoning: Experiences, Lessons, Future Directions.. MIT Press.
 
9
Sandholm, T. and Crites, R. (1995), Multiagent Reinforcement Learning in the Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma. In Biosystems, Special Issue on the Prisoner's Dilemma. January, 1995.
 
10
 
11
 
12
WebCT. Available via: http://www.webct.com/
 
13
Stoane, C. (1985). Study Skills for Home Learners. Programmed Learning and Educational Technology (PLET) Journal of AETT, 22(4).
 
14
Lockwood, F. (1992). Activities in Self-Instructional Texts. Kogan Page.
 
15
Marton, F., & Sääljö, R. (1997). Approaches to Learning. In F. Marton, D. Hounsell, & N.Entwistle (Eds.), The Experience of Learning: Implications for Teaching and Studying in Higher Education, 2nd Edition . Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Rahat Iqbal: colleagues
Peter Every: colleagues