Learning individual group skills for software analysis and design in Africa

ABSTRACT

Software development projects are usually carried out in teams with analysts and designers having to work together towards a common solution. In order to succeed in this environment graduates need to be able to listen to users and to each other, to express their ideas to users and colleagues, to defend their designs, debate design decisions and reach agreement on design compromises and trade-offs.Monash includes the learning of team skills in their graduate attributes. However, teaching of these skills is not explicitly addressed in the teaching program. In many of the units taught in the School of IT at Monash, students are expected to work in groups on projects. However there is no attempt to ensure that they work effectively in these groups and no evaluation of these specific skills in the course of the program.This paper examines the experiences of students in a 2nd year analysis unit and a 3rd year design unit. Students were asked to discuss in an open-ended questionnaire their experiences of working in groups and to evaluate their own skills and those of their colleagues. Of particular interest is the diverse profile of the students who come from across Africa and whether this affected their group skills and what they learned in group work.Students felt that they did learn explicit group skills from the group experience, and they felt that there was a gradual improvement in their group skills over the course of their studies. They felt that being aware of the skills required would increase their learning. Students also reported several negative elements to the experience. The results have implications for how the units are run and ways in which this can be improved will be examined.

REFERENCES

• 1: Aldridge, J. M., Fraser, B. J., and Sebela, M. P. Using teacher action research to promote constructivist learning environments in South Africa. South African Journal of Education, 24, 4 (2004), 245 -- 253.
• 2: Brooks, C. M., and Ammons, J. L. Free riding in group projects and the effects of timing, frequency and specificity of criteria in peer assignments. Journal of Education for Business 78, 5 (May / Jun. 2003), 268 -- 272.
• 3: Butterfield, J., and Bailey, J. J. Socially engineered groups in business curricula: Investigation of the effects of team composition on group output. Journal of Education for Business 72, 2 (Nov. /Dec. 1996), 103 -- 106.
• 4: Coulson-Thomas, C., and Coe, T. The flat organisation: philosophy and practice. IM, Corby, 1991.
• 5: Peter J. Denning, How we will learn, Beyond calculation: the next fifty years, Copernicus, New York, NY, 1997
• 6: Denning, P.J. The future of the IT profession. In: Ubiquity: an ACM IT magazine and forum. Sept - Oct 2000 At http://www.acm.org/ubiquity/interviews/p_denning_1.html (accessed: 15 August 2005)
• 7: Department of Education, Draft White Paper on e-Education: Transforming Learning and Teaching through Information and Communication Technology. South Africa Government Gazette 26 August 2004. Notice 1869 of 2004.
• 8: Department of Education, White Paper on Further Education and Training. South Africa Government Gazette 25 September 1998. Notice 2188 of 1998.
• 9: Dunne, E., and Rawlins, M. Bridging the gap between industry and higher education: Training academics to promote student teamwork. Innovations in Education and Training International, 37, 4 (November 2000). London, 361 -- 371.
• 10: Hargreaves, A. Teaching in the Knowledge Society. Open University Press, Berkshire, 2003.
• 11: Jaques, D. Learning in Groups: a handbook for improving group work, 3rd edition. Kogan Page, London, 2000.
• 12: Mason, R. O., and Mitroff, I. I. Challenging strategic planning assumptions. Wiley, New York, 1981.
• 13: Mathiassen, L., and Purao, S. Educating reflective systems developers. Information Systems Journal, 12 (2002), 81--102.
• 14: Mazany, P., Francis, S., and Sumich, P. Evaluating the effectiveness of an experiential "hybrid" workshop strategy development and team building in a manufacturing organisation. The Journal of Management Development, 14, 1 (1995) 40.
• 15: McDougall, M., and Beattie, R. S. Learning from learning groups. Journal of Management Development, 14, 8 (1995), 35 -- 41.
• 16: McDrury, J., and Alterio. M. Achieving reflective learning using storytelling pathways. Innovations in Education and Training International, 38, 1 (February 2001), 63 -- 74.
• 17: Mutch, A. Employability or learning? Groupwork in higher education. Education and Training, 40, 2 (1998), 50 -- 56.
• 18: Rogers, K., B. Using current research to make "good" decisions about grouping. National Association of Secondary School Principals Bulletin, 82 (1998), 38 -- 46.
• 19: Schön, D., A. The Reflective Practitioner: how professionals think in action. Temple Smith, London 1983.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  K. Computing Milieux
  K.3 COMPUTERS AND EDUCATION
      K.3.2 Computer and Information Science Education
          Subjects: Computer science education

Additional Classification:
  K. Computing Milieux
  K.3 COMPUTERS AND EDUCATION
      K.3.2 Computer and Information Science Education
          Subjects: Self-assessment

General Terms:
Experimentation, Human Factors, Management, Measurement, Performance

Keywords:
group skills, groups, learning groups, reflective practice, teams