|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ABSTRACT
When the computing community turned its attention back to the problem of "pure" symbol manipulation, a large and ever-growing family of "list-processing" ("LP") computer languages resulted. SLIP, which is one of these, was primarily written in FORTRAN, making it easy to use, understand and debug. The widespread use of SLIP, however, has been severely hampered by the restriction of available space in the system. Guided by the desire for more available space, we imposed upon our study the conditions that as few changes as possible should be made to the SLIP system, and additions to the system should be automatic functions of the system and not of the user. This report shows how a paging technique incorporated into the SLIP system accomplished our goal. REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||