ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Hardness of approximating the shortest vector problem in lattices
Full text PdfPdf (187 KB)
Source Journal of the ACM (JACM) archive
Volume 52 ,  Issue 5  (September 2005) table of contents
Pages: 789 - 808  
Year of Publication: 2005
ISSN:0004-5411
Author
Subhash Khot  Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 14,   Downloads (12 Months): 97,   Citation Count: 6
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1089023.1089027
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Let p > 1 be any fixed real. We show that assuming NP ⊈ RP, there is no polynomial time algorithm that approximates the Shortest Vector Problem (SVP) in ℓp norm within a constant factor. Under the stronger assumption NP ⊈ RTIME(2poly(log n)), we show that there is no polynomial-time algorithm with approximation ratio 2(log n)1/2−ε where n is the dimension of the lattice and ε > 0 is an arbitrarily small constant.We first give a new (randomized) reduction from Closest Vector Problem (CVP) to SVP that achieves some constant factor hardness. The reduction is based on BCH Codes. Its advantage is that the SVP instances produced by the reduction behave well under the augmented tensor product, a new variant of tensor product that we introduce. This enables us to boost the hardness factor to 2(log n)1/2-ε.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
2
3
4
5
 
6
Alon, N., Spencer, J., and Erdos, P. 1991. The Probabilistic Method. Wiley-Interscience Series.
 
7
 
8
Banaszczyk, W. 1993. New bounds in some transference theorems in the geometry of numbers. Math. Ann. 296, 625--635.
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
Gauss, C. 1801. Disquisitiones arithmetica (Leipzig, 1801: art. 171). Yale Univ. Press. (English translation by A. A. Clarke, 1966.)
 
16
 
17
 
18
Hastad, J. 1988. Dual vectors and lower bounds for the nearest lattice point problem. Combinatorica 8, 75--81.
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
Kumar, R., and Sivakumar, D. 2001. Complexity of SVP---A reader's digest. Complexity Theory Column, L. Hemaspaandra, Ed. SIGACT News 32, 3.
 
23
Lagarias, J., Lenstra, H., and Schnorr, C. 1990. Korkine--Zolotarev bases and successive minima of a lattice and its reciprocal lattice. Combinatorica 10, 333--348.
24
 
25
Landau, S., and Miller, G. 1985. Solvability of radicals is in polynomial time. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 30, 2, 179--208.
 
26
Lenstra, A., Lenstra, H., and Lovász, L. 1982. Factoring polynomials with rational coefficients. Math. Ann. 261, 513--534.
 
27
Lenstra, H. 1981. Integer programming with a fixed number of variables. Tech. Report 81-03. Univ. of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherland.
 
28
 
29
 
30
Minkowski, H. 1910. Geometrie der zahlen. Tuebner.
31
 
32
 
33
van Emde Boas, P. 1981. Another NP-complete problem and the complexity of computing short vectors in a lattice. Tech. Report 81-04. Mathematische Instiut, Univ. of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherland.